Version nodejs v12.16.1 is already available in the container, the
updated container was released few days back.
Regards,
Honza
On 3/25/20 7:14 AM, Abhinay Purty wrote:
Hello,
Any updates on the last 2 queries ?
Thanks in advance.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:46 PM Abhinay Purty
The nginx container is supported on all those environments -- OpenShift
(thus also Kubernetes), or directly on RHEL (via docker/podman). There
are just differences in how to put configuration and data files that
nginx daemon should use.
If the documentation is not perfect, we welcome any
Based on no feedback, it doesn't seem so, and I'm not aware of any
immediate plans either. However, given the SCLo SIG is open for
community builds, feel free to drive this yourself -- if you're willing
and able to build the packages in CBS, we can help you to set-up the
build tags etc..
We only provide the x86_64 architecture for most of the collections,
with just few exceptions, due to limited resources on people side. Sorry.
Honza
On 09/11/2018 08:55 PM, Perelman, Nathan wrote:
devtoolset-7-libquadmath-devel.i686 is listed as being included in the
Redhat distribution (e.g.
On 02/09/2018 04:23 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
Hi Honza,
On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote:
It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that
we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format,
which is *the ability to share the environment
It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we
introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is
*the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by NFS
sharing *[1].
The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages
available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and CentOS 7.
There are the following packages updates available in
centos-sclo-rh-testing:
rh-postgresql94
rh-postgresql95
rh-mongodb32
rh-mysql56
rh-mysql57
For
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages
available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and 7.
There are the following packages updates available in
centos-sclo-rh-testing:
devtoolset-6
httpd24
rh-nodejs4
rh-nodejs6
rh-ruby24
For installing them, run
On 09/18/2017 07:29 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Using RPM List Builder, I have a recipe for bootstrapping the initial
set of sclo-python RPMs locally in mock:
https://github.com/ncoghlan/pyscl-devel/
Before building that in the CentOS build system, I'm aiming to first
do a preview build in COPR:
Hey Steve,
that all sounds great to me, so welcome on board!
On 09/15/2017 09:35 AM, Steve Traylen wrote:
Hi,
I've requested to join the Software Collections SIG.
Initially I wanted to build and add rh-pythonXX-matplotlib against
Just a small correction here -- such packages should be
Christoph, I'm afraid this request was kinda forgotten without proper
feedback, sorry for that.. Anyway, I expect you talk about devtoolset-6
SCL, right? Have you tried to use the aarch64 packages from buildlogs
(testing repository)?
$ yum install centos-release-scl-rh
$
I've just started the scripts and it should be in repos in couple of
next days, once the publishing scripts notice the change.
Honza
On 08/30/2017 12:05 PM, Thomas Gerbet wrote:
Hello all,
Sorry for the noise (or if it's the wrong place to ask such question)
but I was wondering about the
On 08/26/2017 09:43 AM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Cool. One thing I would recommend is to remove the "Related COPR
projects" from the page since some people might wrongly think that the
SCL is being built with COPR and/or use an old version.
In case of rh-postgresql94, the latest version in COPR is
On 07/26/2017 06:20 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
On 07/17/2017 04:41 PM, Pavel Valena wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jarek Polok"
To: sclorg@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:40:00 PM
Subject: [scl.org] How to get listed on softwarecollections.org ?
On 07/19/2017 04:34 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Hi!
I have a fleet of CentOS and RHEL machines which use rh-postgresql94
SCL.
I saw that RHEL machines got an update to version 9.4.12-1.el7, but the
CentOS machines didn't.
Hi Tadej, I've just started the builds, so they should get to the repos
in
I'm +1 as well.
Honza
On 07/17/2017 05:17 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/07/2017 à 18:36, Jarek Polok a écrit :
Hello all.
For the needs of other project we did rebuild few more packages for
python27 SCLo:
python27-Cython
python27-python-chardet
python27-python-flask
python27-python-requests
On 07/12/2017 08:22 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
1. Create a new sclo-python metapackage, using
https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/rh-python35/tree/master as a
starting p
On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]
wrote:
I’ve been lurking on this list for a while, and I wanted to bring myself up
to date.
Welcome on board!
Honza
On 06/29/2017 04:56 PM, Augusto Caringi wrote:
Hi everyone,
My name is Augusto Caringi, I'm a Software Engineer working at Red Hat in
the Core Services/Databases team and I would like to become member of sclo-sig
to help with packaging of Apache Cassandra.
I definitely agree and the suggested name sclo-cassandra3 looks very
good to me. Let's wait couple of days for other ideas, but if there are
no objections we can ask for tags later next week..
Honza
On 06/14/2017 08:44 AM, Tomas Repik wrote:
Good news everyone!
Past year or so I've been
On 04/11/2017 10:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:50 AM, meson wrote:
Hi,
is there any estimate on when Python 3.6 will be available as SCL?
Our devs are asking about it. If it's
Yes, they do, if there is good enough reason (security or very important
fix). We definitely don't include all fixes.
Anyway, if there are reasons to have a newer git SCL, I'm totally not
against, we can have sclo-git212.. the changes in Fedora SPEC are not
that big..
Honza
On 03/10/2017
Hi, we track this request at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12844
and just need to find a person eligible (Evolution seems to be the right
person) for changing the page. So far I don't see any reason why adding
links to keys should be problem.. except it takes time, which I'm sorry
it ourself.
-Original Message-
From: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of
Griffin, Wesley (Fed)
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:49 AM
To: Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com>; sclorg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemon
This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea
shared at
http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html.
Shortly, SCL has worked nicely for several years and people love them.
But even the beloved ones have some issues. And what we hear
Hi Nick,
I see 04/29/2017 to be the expire date for the current cert. Your wget
also works for me.
In any case, getting the RPM files from softwarecollections.org (your
link) for devtoolset-3 is the obsolete way, please, install the packages
using the directions available at
I'm sorry for having those troubles before notifying before, it was
simply an error. However, since we haven't got more feedback, it looks
like majority of users already switched to the current way of installing
packages, which is on CentOS:
yum install centos-release-scl-rh
and on RHEL:
On 12/08/2016 11:06 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 12/06/2016 02:48 PM, Stefan Ring wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Java collections were typically bootstrapped by using older packages
from other collections or from RHEL. Specifically,
On 11/22/2016 10:53 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com
<mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
We still haven't finished rebuilding of the following two new SCLs
that are part of RHSCL 2.3:
rh-thermostat16
RHSCL 2.3, which was released recently [1], includes several new
collections. SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in
cbs.centos.org by SCLo SIG group.
The packages are now available in the testing repositories via e.g.:
sudo yum install centos-release-scl
sudo yum-config-manager
The packages have never been there, right? That's because users should
just install the packages either from RHSCL repos or CentOS mirrors
directly, depending on the system they use.
It should be hopefully clear from the information on this page:
RHSCL 2.2 was released recently [1] and this release includes several
new collections:
rh-mariadb101
rh-postgresql95
rh-maven33
rh-mongodb30upg
rh-mongodb32
rh-python35
rh-nodejs4
rh-ruby23
rh-ror42
SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in cbs.centos.org by SCLo
SIG
On 05/17/2016 02:57 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Also, adding some of the packages
available in php5x-more to the official php scls, like the mcrypt and
imap modules for example?
I have started adding some in centos-sclo-sclo repository
See:
The meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 18:00 Brno, 12:00 Boston,
1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
No specific agenda for today, but will be available today for discussion
if necessary. Except that, I'd like to look for a new timeslot for the
meeting, we
Hi Noah,
thank you for reporting, the issue with wrong redirection link was
caused by mistake and we're already fixing the redirection, so the old
links will work again soon.
Now, for the question about supported CentOS and RHSCL builds -- we're
now working on updating information for all
that they'll work.
Regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] Im Auftrag
von Honza Horak
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. März 2016 07:41
An: sclorg@redhat.com
Betreff: Re: [scl.org] Docker file for rpm building
I personally prefer mock
On 03/08/2016 01:16 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hi Honza
On 03/08/2016 12:37 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/04/2016 04:25 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
if I read this correctly, I can use the workflow described in the
readme of
https://github.com/sclorg/centpkg-sclo to get started, right?
Yes
Nice work, Jarek!
There is a middle-step between candidate and release that you may use --
you can tag your builds to -testing tag and request adding the packages
to buildlogs repos (my similar request for other SCLs:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10491)
Then packages will be
On 03/04/2016 02:37 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Ok. For me it will be the first time building an scl, so I'll need a
direction on where to start. So please notify me when repositories to clone
into are setup. But I know my way around rpm building in general.
SCL specifics are documented
On 03/04/2016 11:28 AM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hello list
Current rh collections contain git19 one and my
understanding is RH is not going to put a newer git
version in there anytime soon (?) ..
Definitely not into the existing collection, since the versions are not
compatible. I don't think
On 03/04/2016 11:41 AM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hello list
At present subversion versions on 6 and 7 differ
(1.6.X vs. 1.7.x): and these two version use incompatible
structure of local working copy (checkout).
In our place where user accounts data is stored
on a shared filesystem above causes major
On 03/01/2016 03:42 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
So, the only real issue seems to be the missing source .rpm for
felix-gogo-parent.
Do you think sources from devtoolset-3 could be used?
https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/felix-gogo-parent/tree/sig-sclo6-devtoolset-3-rh
+1 from me, Marek is one of the members of rhscl team.
Honza
On 02/02/2016 04:00 PM, Marek Skalický wrote:
Hello everyone!
My name is Marek Skalický and I would like to become member
of sclo-sig to help with packaging of MongoDB related packages.
Cheers,
Marek
{mskalick}
* tags for new collections ruby, ror, python and maven created:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10256
* we agreed to use scl-httpd24-mod_auth_mellon for the mod_auth_mellon,
extending httpd24 SCL (related to
https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2016-January/msg00068.html)
we should
On 11/30/2015 04:47 PM, Robert Kratky wrote:
if the centos-release-scl-rh were to have a Provides: that matches
> >something that's also available from the RHSCL's setup, then this might
> >not be a problem; in an environ that has the RHSCL's setup, the content
> >will just come from there ( it
45 matches
Mail list logo