Re: [scl.org] Queries regarding nodejs 12 image

2020-03-26 Thread Honza Horak
Version nodejs v12.16.1 is already available in the container, the updated container was released few days back. Regards, Honza On 3/25/20 7:14 AM, Abhinay Purty wrote: Hello, Any updates on the last 2 queries ? Thanks in advance. On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:46 PM Abhinay Purty

Re: [scl.org] Nginx Container - Secure version question

2019-12-18 Thread Honza Horak
The nginx container is supported on all those environments -- OpenShift (thus also Kubernetes), or directly on RHEL (via docker/podman). There are just differences in how to put configuration and data files that nginx daemon should use. If the documentation is not perfect, we welcome any

Re: [scl.org] JMC for CentOS

2019-04-15 Thread Honza Horak
Based on no feedback, it doesn't seem so, and I'm not aware of any immediate plans either. However, given the SCLo SIG is open for community builds, feel free to drive this yourself -- if you're willing and able to build the packages in CBS, we can help you to set-up the build tags etc..

Re: [scl.org] devtoolset-7-libquadmath-devel.i686 missing from CentOS 7 SCL Repo

2018-09-25 Thread Honza Horak
We only provide the x86_64 architecture for most of the collections, with just few exceptions, due to limited resources on people side. Sorry. Honza On 09/11/2018 08:55 PM, Perelman, Nathan wrote: devtoolset-7-libquadmath-devel.i686 is listed as being included in the Redhat distribution (e.g.

Re: [scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS?

2018-02-09 Thread Honza Horak
On 02/09/2018 04:23 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote: Hi Honza, On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote: It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is *the ability to share the environment

[scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS?

2018-02-09 Thread Honza Horak
It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by NFS sharing *[1]. The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your

[scl.org] Updated SCLs with PostgreSQL 9.4 and 9.5, MySQL 5.6 and 5.7, MongoDB 3.2 available for testing

2017-10-31 Thread Honza Horak
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and CentOS 7. There are the following packages updates available in centos-sclo-rh-testing: rh-postgresql94 rh-postgresql95 rh-mongodb32 rh-mysql56 rh-mysql57 For

[scl.org] Updated SCLs with NodeJS 4 and 6, Ruby 2.4, Apache httpd 2.4, and devtoolset-6 available for testing

2017-10-31 Thread Honza Horak
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and 7. There are the following packages updates available in centos-sclo-rh-testing: devtoolset-6 httpd24 rh-nodejs4 rh-nodejs6 rh-ruby24 For installing them, run

Re: [scl.org] Setting SCL RPM build options in COPR?

2017-09-18 Thread Honza Horak
On 09/18/2017 07:29 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: Using RPM List Builder, I have a recipe for bootstrapping the initial set of sclo-python RPMs locally in mock: https://github.com/ncoghlan/pyscl-devel/ Before building that in the CentOS build system, I'm aiming to first do a preview build in COPR:

Re: [scl.org] Introduction from me.

2017-09-15 Thread Honza Horak
Hey Steve, that all sounds great to me, so welcome on board! On 09/15/2017 09:35 AM, Steve Traylen wrote: Hi, I've requested to join the Software Collections SIG. Initially I wanted to build and add rh-pythonXX-matplotlib against Just a small correction here -- such packages should be

Re: [scl.org] SCL devtoolset on arm64/aarch64

2017-09-14 Thread Honza Horak
Christoph, I'm afraid this request was kinda forgotten without proper feedback, sorry for that.. Anyway, I expect you talk about devtoolset-6 SCL, right? Have you tried to use the aarch64 packages from buildlogs (testing repository)? $ yum install centos-release-scl-rh $

Re: [scl.org] Update to rh-git29-git-2.9.3-3

2017-09-07 Thread Honza Horak
I've just started the scripts and it should be in repos in couple of next days, once the publishing scripts notice the change. Honza On 08/30/2017 12:05 PM, Thomas Gerbet wrote: Hello all, Sorry for the noise (or if it's the wrong place to ask such question) but I was wondering about the

Re: [scl.org] When will rh-postgresql94 SCL be updated in CentOS?

2017-08-27 Thread Honza Horak
On 08/26/2017 09:43 AM, Tadej Janež wrote: Cool. One thing I would recommend is to remove the "Related COPR projects" from the page since some people might wrongly think that the SCL is being built with COPR and/or use an old version. In case of rh-postgresql94, the latest version in COPR is

Re: [scl.org] How to get listed on softwarecollections.org ?

2017-07-31 Thread Honza Horak
On 07/26/2017 06:20 PM, Jarek Polok wrote: On 07/17/2017 04:41 PM, Pavel Valena wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jarek Polok" To: sclorg@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:40:00 PM Subject: [scl.org] How to get listed on softwarecollections.org ?

Re: [scl.org] When will rh-postgresql94 SCL be updated in CentOS?

2017-07-28 Thread Honza Horak
On 07/19/2017 04:34 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: Hi! I have a fleet of CentOS and RHEL machines which use rh-postgresql94 SCL. I saw that RHEL machines got an update to version 9.4.12-1.el7, but the CentOS machines didn't. Hi Tadej, I've just started the builds, so they should get to the repos in

Re: [scl.org] New pythonXXmore collection(s) ?

2017-07-19 Thread Honza Horak
I'm +1 as well. Honza On 07/17/2017 05:17 PM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/07/2017 à 18:36, Jarek Polok a écrit : Hello all. For the needs of other project we did rebuild few more packages for python27 SCLo: python27-Cython python27-python-chardet python27-python-flask python27-python-requests

Re: [scl.org] Python "latest" SCLo

2017-07-13 Thread Honza Horak
On 07/12/2017 08:22 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com> wrote: On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: 1. Create a new sclo-python metapackage, using https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/rh-python35/tree/master as a starting p

Re: [scl.org] Python "latest" SCLo

2017-07-11 Thread Honza Horak
On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote: I’ve been lurking on this list for a while, and I wanted to bring myself up to date.

Re: [scl.org] Self-introduction

2017-06-30 Thread Honza Horak
Welcome on board! Honza On 06/29/2017 04:56 PM, Augusto Caringi wrote: Hi everyone, My name is Augusto Caringi, I'm a Software Engineer working at Red Hat in the Core Services/Databases team and I would like to become member of sclo-sig to help with packaging of Apache Cassandra.

Re: [scl.org] New SCLo collection: cassandra3 ?

2017-06-16 Thread Honza Horak
I definitely agree and the suggested name sclo-cassandra3 looks very good to me. Let's wait couple of days for other ideas, but if there are no objections we can ask for tags later next week.. Honza On 06/14/2017 08:44 AM, Tomas Repik wrote: Good news everyone! Past year or so I've been

Re: [scl.org] Python 3.6 availability

2017-04-13 Thread Honza Horak
On 04/11/2017 10:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:50 AM, meson wrote: Hi, is there any estimate on when Python 3.6 will be available as SCL? Our devs are asking about it. If it's

Re: [scl.org] New git package

2017-04-10 Thread Honza Horak
Yes, they do, if there is good enough reason (security or very important fix). We definitely don't include all fixes. Anyway, if there are reasons to have a newer git SCL, I'm totally not against, we can have sclo-git212.. the changes in Fedora SPEC are not that big.. Honza On 03/10/2017

Re: [scl.org] Asking questions via StackOverflow

2017-04-10 Thread Honza Horak
Hi, we track this request at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12844 and just need to find a person eligible (Evolution seems to be the right person) for changing the page. So far I don't see any reason why adding links to keys should be problem.. except it takes time, which I'm sorry

Re: [scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemons Made System-wide

2017-03-22 Thread Honza Horak
it ourself. -Original Message- From: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Griffin, Wesley (Fed) Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:49 AM To: Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com>; sclorg@redhat.com Subject: Re: [scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemon

[scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemons Made System-wide

2017-03-21 Thread Honza Horak
This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea shared at http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html. Shortly, SCL has worked nicely for several years and people love them. But even the beloved ones have some issues. And what we hear

Re: [scl.org] your cert expired.

2017-02-13 Thread Honza Horak
Hi Nick, I see 04/29/2017 to be the expire date for the current cert. Your wget also works for me. In any case, getting the RPM files from softwarecollections.org (your link) for devtoolset-3 is the obsolete way, please, install the packages using the directions available at

Re: [scl.org] Broken URLs

2017-01-23 Thread Honza Horak
I'm sorry for having those troubles before notifying before, it was simply an error. However, since we haven't got more feedback, it looks like majority of users already switched to the current way of installing packages, which is on CentOS: yum install centos-release-scl-rh and on RHEL:

Re: [scl.org] Bootstrapping devtoolset?

2016-12-08 Thread Honza Horak
On 12/08/2016 11:06 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 12/06/2016 02:48 PM, Stefan Ring wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: Java collections were typically bootstrapped by using older packages from other collections or from RHEL. Specifically,

Re: [scl.org] [CentOS-devel] New SCL packages for CentOS available for testing

2016-12-05 Thread Honza Horak
On 11/22/2016 10:53 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com <mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote: We still haven't finished rebuilding of the following two new SCLs that are part of RHSCL 2.3: rh-thermostat16

[scl.org] New SCL packages for CentOS available for testing

2016-11-21 Thread Honza Horak
RHSCL 2.3, which was released recently [1], includes several new collections. SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in cbs.centos.org by SCLo SIG group. The packages are now available in the testing repositories via e.g.: sudo yum install centos-release-scl sudo yum-config-manager

Re: [scl.org] rh-python35 package files

2016-08-04 Thread Honza Horak
The packages have never been there, right? That's because users should just install the packages either from RHSCL repos or CentOS mirrors directly, depending on the system they use. It should be hopefully clear from the information on this page:

[scl.org] New SCL packages for CentOS available for testing

2016-06-03 Thread Honza Horak
RHSCL 2.2 was released recently [1] and this release includes several new collections: rh-mariadb101 rh-postgresql95 rh-maven33 rh-mongodb30upg rh-mongodb32 rh-python35 rh-nodejs4 rh-ruby23 rh-ror42 SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in cbs.centos.org by SCLo SIG

Re: [scl.org] [CentOS-devel] CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting (2016-05-17)

2016-05-17 Thread Honza Horak
On 05/17/2016 02:57 PM, Remi Collet wrote: Also, adding some of the packages available in php5x-more to the official php scls, like the mcrypt and imap modules for example? I have started adding some in centos-sclo-sclo repository See:

[scl.org] CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting (2016-04-20)

2016-04-20 Thread Honza Horak
The meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 18:00 Brno, 12:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode. No specific agenda for today, but will be available today for discussion if necessary. Except that, I'd like to look for a new timeslot for the meeting, we

Re: [scl.org] Software collections on RHEL

2016-03-15 Thread Honza Horak
Hi Noah, thank you for reporting, the issue with wrong redirection link was caused by mistake and we're already fixing the redirection, so the old links will work again soon. Now, for the question about supported CentOS and RHSCL builds -- we're now working on updating information for all

Re: [scl.org] Docker file for rpm building

2016-03-10 Thread Honza Horak
that they'll work. Regards, Daniel -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] Im Auftrag von Honza Horak Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. März 2016 07:41 An: sclorg@redhat.com Betreff: Re: [scl.org] Docker file for rpm building I personally prefer mock

Re: [scl.org] Introducing httpd24more Software Collection

2016-03-09 Thread Honza Horak
On 03/08/2016 01:16 PM, Jarek Polok wrote: Hi Honza On 03/08/2016 12:37 PM, Honza Horak wrote: On 03/04/2016 04:25 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote: Hi, if I read this correctly, I can use the workflow described in the readme of https://github.com/sclorg/centpkg-sclo to get started, right? Yes

Re: [scl.org] Introducing httpd24more Software Collection

2016-03-04 Thread Honza Horak
Nice work, Jarek! There is a middle-step between candidate and release that you may use -- you can tag your builds to -testing tag and request adding the packages to buildlogs repos (my similar request for other SCLs: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10491) Then packages will be

Re: [scl.org] New SCLo collection: git25 ?

2016-03-04 Thread Honza Horak
On 03/04/2016 02:37 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote: Ok. For me it will be the first time building an scl, so I'll need a direction on where to start. So please notify me when repositories to clone into are setup. But I know my way around rpm building in general. SCL specifics are documented

Re: [scl.org] New SCLo collection: git25 ?

2016-03-04 Thread Honza Horak
On 03/04/2016 11:28 AM, Jarek Polok wrote: Hello list Current rh collections contain git19 one and my understanding is RH is not going to put a newer git version in there anytime soon (?) .. Definitely not into the existing collection, since the versions are not compatible. I don't think

Re: [scl.org] New SCLo collection: subversion19 ?

2016-03-04 Thread Honza Horak
On 03/04/2016 11:41 AM, Jarek Polok wrote: Hello list At present subversion versions on 6 and 7 differ (1.6.X vs. 1.7.x): and these two version use incompatible structure of local working copy (checkout). In our place where user accounts data is stored on a shared filesystem above causes major

Re: [scl.org] devtoolset 2?

2016-03-01 Thread Honza Horak
On 03/01/2016 03:42 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: So, the only real issue seems to be the missing source .rpm for felix-gogo-parent. Do you think sources from devtoolset-3 could be used? https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/felix-gogo-parent/tree/sig-sclo6-devtoolset-3-rh

Re: [scl.org] Self-introduction - Marek Skalický

2016-02-02 Thread Honza Horak
+1 from me, Marek is one of the members of rhscl team. Honza On 02/02/2016 04:00 PM, Marek Skalický wrote: Hello everyone! My name is Marek Skalický and I would like to become member of sclo-sig to help with packaging of MongoDB related packages. Cheers, Marek {mskalick}

[scl.org] Minutes from CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel (2016-01-27)

2016-01-27 Thread Honza Horak
* tags for new collections ruby, ror, python and maven created: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10256 * we agreed to use scl-httpd24-mod_auth_mellon for the mod_auth_mellon, extending httpd24 SCL (related to https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2016-January/msg00068.html) we should

Re: [scl.org] Announcing release for Vagrant 1.7.4 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

2016-01-18 Thread Honza Horak
On 11/30/2015 04:47 PM, Robert Kratky wrote: if the centos-release-scl-rh were to have a Provides: that matches > >something that's also available from the RHSCL's setup, then this might > >not be a problem; in an environ that has the RHSCL's setup, the content > >will just come from there ( it