[scm-migration-dev] cstyle, for gate hooks

2008-06-20 Thread Richard Lowe
Dean Roehrich writes: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:16:04PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: >> Dean Roehrich writes: >> >> > One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our >> > project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the >> > first >> > line

[scm-migration-dev] cstyle, for gate hooks

2008-06-20 Thread Richard Lowe
Dean Roehrich writes: > One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our > project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the first > line of the cset comments, only one head, ...and cstyle. It's easy to enforce > the cstyle rules, given the way o

[scm-migration-dev] cstyle, for gate hooks

2008-06-20 Thread Dean Roehrich
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:16:04PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > Dean Roehrich writes: > > > One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our > > project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the > > first > > line of the cset comments, only one h

[scm-migration-dev] cstyle, for gate hooks

2008-06-20 Thread Dean Roehrich
One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the first line of the cset comments, only one head, ...and cstyle. It's easy to enforce the cstyle rules, given the way our source tree is set up. This

[scm-migration-dev] cstyle, for gate hooks

2008-06-20 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 13:08 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > >> That's clearly a bug in the python shim between the two, we shouldn't > >> do that, and it will need to be fixed. (you'd be just as screwed if > >> you did 'hg cstyle', or should have been...) > > > > I don't see the problem when running