[scm-migration-dev] code review request for nightly.sh usability fixes

2008-07-31 Thread Mike Kupfer
The CLOSED_IS_PRESENT changes look correct to me. > "Mark" == Mark J Nelson writes: Mark> Yeah, since I only missed two previously, I went ahead and stayed Mark> with $CODEMGR_WS/usr/closed for these. Okay. Mike> Second issue: can you show an example of the mail message with the Mike> new

[scm-migration-dev] code review request: closed repo changes

2008-07-31 Thread Mark J. Nelson
External folks may stop reading now, this won't be interesting. I propagated the following fixes: 286 deleted_files needs to be deleted post-migration 444 building inside an ON repository overwhelms hgignore mechanism 4758439 some files use "current date" sccs keywords into a closed repository.

[scm-migration-dev] Agenda: 8/1/08 SCM Migration Project meeting

2008-07-31 Thread Linda Bernal
Fri, 8/1/08 10:30am-11:00am PDT Intl 215-446-3661 US 866-545-5223 AC 5540840 Proposed Agenda * Gatekeeper tools/ON transition * Documentation update * What else? -Linda

[scm-migration-dev] 563 Prototypes should not contain SCCS keywords

2008-07-31 Thread richl...@richlowe.net
Author: Richard Lowe Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-transition Latest revision: a1335bc68aeca4aa3be55f349fd527fc12586445 Total changesets: 1 Log message: 563 Prototypes should not contain SCCS keywords Files: update: usr/src/prototypes/prototype.Makefile update: usr/src/protot

[scm-migration-dev] [Bug 563] Prototypes should not contain SCCS keywords

2008-07-31 Thread bugzilla-dae...@np.grommit.com
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563 richlowe at richlowe.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[scm-migration-dev] Sponsor task SCM updates

2008-07-31 Thread Mark J. Nelson
>> The full context here, from the current site: >> "As opposed to the SCCS delta comment, the putback comment should have an >> additional line, of one of the following two formats, either: >> >> Contributed by Firstname Lastname. >> >> or >> >> Contributed by Firstname Lastname . >> >> Which for

[scm-migration-dev] Sponsor task SCM updates

2008-07-31 Thread Richard Lowe
"Mark J. Nelson" writes: >>> The full context here, from the current site: >>> "As opposed to the SCCS delta comment, the putback comment should have an >>> additional line, of one of the following two formats, either: >>> >>> Contributed by Firstname Lastname. >>> >>> or >>> >>> Contributed by F

[scm-migration-dev] RTI Nits changes for hg transition

2008-07-31 Thread Mark J. Nelson
SCM folks: Do you have any advice on this section? Advocates ... * Workspace checking is highly recommended, as it is easy and quick and has prevented many problems; also, many problems which could have easily been prevented were from workspaces which

[scm-migration-dev] Sponsor task SCM updates

2008-07-31 Thread Mark J. Nelson
Rich's suggestion sounds clear to me. --Mark On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Richard Lowe wrote: > Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:28:41 -0400 > From: Richard Lowe > To: Mark J. Nelson > Cc: Valerie Bubb Fenwick , > John Beck , scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: Sponsor task SCM updates >