Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-09 Thread Gour
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:50:07 +0100 Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: Hi developers, - All processing is based on plain Python scripts, the only additional dependencies are either lxml or libxml2. (for creating the PDF files, you also need to have a renderer like fop, xep or jw

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-09 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi Gour, On 09.05.2013 10:33, Gour wrote: On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:50:07 +0100 Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: [...] I settled to use SCons for my PyQt project and was reading the User Manual yesterday and e.g. found that the email addresses listed are wrong (e.g. us...@scons.tigris.org)

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-09 Thread Gour
On Thu, 9 May 2013 17:06:35 -0400 Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com wrote: I see this as an iterative process. The first thing was to rationalize the tool chain and use one tool for everything. Formerly we had a hodgepodge of stuff. Now that it's decently organized, there's of course

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-09 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hello Gour, On 09.05.2013 22:53, Gour wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:14:29 +0200 Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: [...] If it's good-enough for Python project docs itself, I believe it should be for SCons as well. that's okay...but to make me believe this as well, you (or someone else)

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-09 Thread Bill Deegan
In SCons as with all opensource.. words are ok, but functional tested, documented pull requests are rare and priceless! -Bill On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: Hello Gour, On 09.05.2013 22:53, Gour wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:14:29 +0200 Dirk Bächle