On 19.02.2014 06:15, Bill Deegan wrote:
Anatoly,
bootstrap.py is not meant to be run by users, only developers.
-Bill
I'd even go one step further and say: it's primarily meant to be run by
release managers.
It's okay if you take on this role for yourself as a developer while
you're
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 23:19 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[…]
My opinion is that by adding additional dependencies to run the SCons
without errors from a fresh checkout we are significantly increasing
contribution
barrier and discouraging people from participating.
I agree that this might
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com wrote:
Anatoly,
bootstrap.py is not meant to be run by users, only developers.
I believe there is a terminology confusion. User is anybody who uses SCons.
Developer is anybody with commit right to the SCons repository.
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 16:44 +, Managan, Rob wrote:
[…]
You can execute the local SCons directly from the src/ subdirectory by
first setting the SCONS_LIB_DIR environment variable to the local
src/engine subdirectory, and then executing the local src/script/scons.py
script to populate the
On 19.02.2014 18:07, Bill Deegan wrote:
Might I suggest we stop discussing it and just propose pull requests.
If you have a specific change in mind, then make it and send a pull
request.
Yup, I'm all for it. @Anatoly: the commits that introduced the new doc
toolchain are 8ca01af:0c9c8af
