On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:56 +0100, William L Blevins wrote:
> > […]
> > I have used Jira and I think if we can get free instances for the
> > project, then the direct jira -> bitbucket <- confluence setup will
> > give
Hi all,
On 28.09.2015 14:42, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 15:03 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
Maybe worth sticking in a scons bitbucket repo?
[…]
A DVCS repository is indeed where all code belongs :-)
the basic part of the import routines is already under DVCS at the
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:56 +0100, William L Blevins wrote:
> […]
> I have used Jira and I think if we can get free instances for the
> project, then the direct jira -> bitbucket <- confluence setup will
> give us a lot of project management control.
Personally I found Confluence a right royal
On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 15:03 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Maybe worth sticking in a scons bitbucket repo?
>
[…]
A DVCS repository is indeed where all code belongs :-)
In this case I think this is very important. Whatever the rights and
wrongs of issue trackers other than Tigris, I feel it is
On September 28, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
>On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 15:03 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
>> Maybe worth sticking in a scons bitbucket repo?
>>
>[…]
>A DVCS repository is indeed where all code belongs :-)
>In this case I think this is very important.
I I am 1+ for having the tool integrated. I would prefer to have a common
portal for SCons vs many different websites and tools. I know this is a
balancing act, but the more we can do this, the better.
Jason
From: William L Blevins
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 7:56 AM
To: SCons developer