Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Alexandre Feblot wrote: > Hi, > Call me the Grinch, but I have the feeling there are 2 kinds of people in > the world: > * those who behave naturally, who don't need such written CoC because it is > obvious for them, And they are also +1,

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > As Bill reported, people start to ask for a CoC when looking at a project. What are their motivations? 1. "I am acting according to rules. I want to know if your rules match those that I am acting." 2. "I am too vulnerable. I

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

Anatoly, In the entire history of SCons we've only had a small handful of instances where any of the proposed CoC's might have been violated. So infrequent I can't remember the last one. That said, if you can prove harm or point to any project where it harmed their community to have a CoC, then

Re: [Scons-dev] Multiple heads in repository

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:12 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I mean that it is impossible to get into this state with Git, right? > I think you are correct. This is a "feature" of mercurial. Likely due to it's lack of support of (as I consider them) light weight branches.

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On 08.12.2015 20:01, anatoly techtonik wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: As Bill reported, people start to ask for a CoC when looking at a project. What are their motivations? 1. "I am acting according to rules. I want to know if your rules match

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On 08.12.2015 22:36, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Indeed. I think the discussion so far points to let's have one, keep it short & sweet. I don't see any real reasons not to, and some possible benefits to having one. +1, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list