Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki is down

2014-12-11 Thread anatoly techtonik
I am saying that design matters and BitBucket design is much much worse that current moin. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com wrote: Anatoly, I'm not sure I understand, are you saying that moin moin is the only wiki solution which would work for us? -Bill

Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki is down

2014-12-11 Thread Bill Deegan
Anatoly, So you're talking about how it looks? -Bill On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:38 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: I am saying that design matters and BitBucket design is much much worse that current moin. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Bill Deegan

Re: [Scons-dev] What to replace the wiki with?

2014-12-11 Thread Dirk Bächle
Bill, On 12.12.2014 00:52, Bill Deegan wrote: I'm thinking a hg repo and some sort of ci to process it when new changes come in. Or use readthedocs.org http://readthedocs.org (It has integration with bitbucket for such already) That way users and do pull requests and also the webserver only

Re: [Scons-dev] What to replace the wiki with?

2014-12-11 Thread Bill Deegan
Dirk, Trying to figure out a way we can avoid the spam problem we've had so far. I think a pull request flow would be a more visible implementation of the approveChanges configuration we have currently. So maybe it would be more community documentation rather than wiki. (effectively the same,