Re: [Scons-dev] scons-2.5.0 performance issue?

Bill, below is the output of --debug=count, it is identical with scons-2.4.1 and scons-2.5.0. Since my case was about the no-op build (nothing is built), less parallelization should not be an issue. We do have about 900 Qt Moc generated files in our build, and I guess 1-2000 other generated

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.5.0 Released

Thanks Bill From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] On Behalf Of Bill Deegan Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 8:41 PM To: SCons developer list Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.5.0 Released Jason, I'll try it on my windows box tomorrow. -Bill On Mon, Apr

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons PDF docs

Dirk, I believe you are right about fop. I'll make the change and give it a try. Thanks. -Bill On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 11.04.2016 23:43, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> Dirk or anyone else super familiar with the doc toolchain, >> >> >> Is

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.5.0 Released

Jason, I'll try it on my windows box tomorrow. -Bill On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Jason Kenny wrote: > Hi Bill, > > I have tried this on different system. Below is from a fresh VM of windows > with python 2.7.11. I believe only Ubuntu has worked in at all. Fedora and >

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.5.0 Released

Great! -Bill On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst < deb...@jff-webhosting.net> wrote: > Hello, > > great work. :-) > > And already at Debian unstable. > > > CU > Jörg > -- > New: > GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D > GPG key (long) :

[Scons-dev] scons-2.5.0 performance issue?

Hi all, First of all, thanks for the 2.5.0 release! I have tested it in the build at my dayjob now, where we have a large C++ application built with scons: around 7-8000 .cpp files, same amount of headers, some code generation steps including Qt moc-ing. Unfortunately it seems that something has

Re: [Scons-dev] scons-2.5.0 performance issue?

Thomas, Can you run and post with "--debug=count"? Thanks, Bill On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Thomas Berg wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all, thanks for the 2.5.0 release! > > I have tested it in the build at my dayjob now, where we have a large > C++ application built

Re: [Scons-dev] scons-2.5.0 performance issue?

Thomas, Even on no-op, the difference in dependency generation could be substantial. Consider comparing '--tree=prune' between a small QT target between 2.5.0 and 2.4.1 and I think you will see that they are quite different. V/R, William On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Thomas Berg

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

Hi, On 10.04.2016 20:56, Bill Deegan wrote: All, Here's what I propose. 1. Merge scons_python3 down to default. It's o.k if it's broken for a bit. We can always do bug fixes out of rel_2.5.0 branch if needed and merge those down. 2. I'm o.k. with many tests failing when merged down to

Re: [Scons-dev] scons-2.5.0 performance issue?

Hi Thomas, On 11.04.2016 16:59, Thomas Berg wrote: Bill, below is the output of --debug=count, it is identical with scons-2.4.1 and scons-2.5.0. Since my case was about the no-op build (nothing is built), less parallelization should not be an issue. ... if you haven't already done so, you

Re: [Scons-dev] scons-2.5.0 performance issue?

Thomas, Can you run --debug=objects on the other versions as well? Just want to see if the object counts have change significantly between 2.5.0 and the others. Thanks, Bill On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Berg wrote: > Bill, below is the output of

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Hi Russel, On 10.04.2016 13:10, Russel Winder wrote: The python3-port currently has: 47 test fails 108 no results [...] Sorry I didn't get much done on this over the last 12 weeks, long (and tedious) story – which no-one is interested in. you have done a lot...by starting the task and

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.5.0 Released

pip install works for me. What version of pip are you running? I tried the latest and a previous version. -Bill On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Jason Kenny wrote: > One other low hanging fruit would be to fix the pip install issues. > > Jason >

[Scons-dev] SCons PDF docs

Dirk or anyone else super familiar with the doc toolchain, Is it possible to generate the docs with PDF bookmarks? (something like this : http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/PdfBookmarks.html) It would be great to be able to navigate more easily. -Bill

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons PDF docs

Hi Bill, On 11.04.2016 23:43, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk or anyone else super familiar with the doc toolchain, Is it possible to generate the docs with PDF bookmarks? (something like this : http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/PdfBookmarks.html) It would be great to be able to navigate more