[Scons-dev] Building docs

Can someone point me to instructions for running a build of the docs so as to test tool documentation XML isn't broken? -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41

Re: [Scons-dev] D tool development workflow

On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 10:42 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > I appreciate your point of view. I think we all agree on the principle, but the details are getting in the way of practicality. > But for many years now it has been separate. And I suspect only the stalwarts and old hands even go there. >

Re: [Scons-dev] Building docs

Hi Russel, this is where the DocBook DSL saves the day for you. It should be sufficient to validate your / all docs by using the provided script in 'bin' of the source tree. Please follow the instructions/links in the DeveloperGuide intro (wiki) if you need more infos about this. Best

[Scons-dev] SCons front webpage

It appears the three images for the Badges at the top of the front page of teh website have gone awol. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm:

Re: [Scons-dev] tools and testing

On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 10:34 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > Plenty of existing end to end tests function with mocked out external > tools. > Any reason this can't be done for your pull request? The current pull request doesn't need such a thing as it doesn't include the dub tool. I believe the tests

Re: [Scons-dev] Building docs

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 11:21 +0200, Dirk Baechle wrote: > Hi Russel,  > > this is where the DocBook DSL saves the day for you. It should be > sufficient to validate your / all docs by using the provided script > in 'bin' of the source tree.  > Please follow the instructions/links in the

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons front webpage

Yup. Must be a change in the widgets.. Care to track it down? -Bill On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > > It appears the three images for the Badges at the top of the front page > of teh website have gone awol. > > -- > Russel. >

Re: [Scons-dev] tools and testing

Is this bug resolved? http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2993 On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 10:34 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > > Plenty of existing end to end tests function with mocked out external > > tools. >

Re: [Scons-dev] D tool development workflow

Russel, At present I'm spending all my available energy and time on getting py2+py3 working. Once that is done, then we can look at migrating the bug tracker, but not before. That said, I'm thinking post 3 a migration to github could have some real value. (And git, I'm tired of using HG on only

Re: [Scons-dev] D tool development workflow

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > That said, I'm thinking post 3 a migration to github could have some real > value. > (And git, I'm tired of using HG on only this project) I would be so happy about this. I would gladly volunteer to help. I'm all

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons front webpage

Uh, This is what I see: [cid:image001.png@01D2BA85.48126EF0] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- Rob Managan WCI/DP Division LLNL P.O. Box 808, L-095 Livermore, CA 94551-0808 Email: manag...@llnl.gov Phone: 925-423-0903 FAX: 925-422-3389 On 4/21/17, 9:42 AM, "Scons-dev on

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons front webpage

Rob, I think it's the ones which should show up on the bitbucket repo. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons They're just text links now instead of javascript widgets.. -BIll On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Managan, Rob wrote: > Uh, > > This is what I see: > > > > > >

Re: [Scons-dev] D tool development workflow

I guess the only question is what to do with the outstanding pull requests.. If we can leave them on bitbucket and migrate them after, then I could be convinced to do the transition before 3.0.. (or as part of 3.0 release) -Bill On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Gary Oberbrunner

Re: [Scons-dev] tools and testing

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:36 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > Is this bug resolved? > > http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2993 > > I suspect not given the name of the reporter. :-) I'd have to spend a bit of time properly researching the report, creating a test, and then putting a

Re: [Scons-dev] D tool development workflow

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:41 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > Russel, > > At present I'm spending all my available energy and time on getting > py2+py3 > working. > Once that is done, then we can look at migrating the bug tracker, but > not > before. Exactly, getting the Python 3 stuff finished

Re: [Scons-dev] D tool development workflow

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 12:55 -0400, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > […] > > I would be so happy about this. I would gladly volunteer to help. I'm > all > git+github for literally everything else, home & work. I think I have been tainted by Apache do-ocracy from association with Apache Groovy: to those

Re: [Scons-dev] tools and testing

:) Sounds good. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:36 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > > Is this bug resolved? > > > > http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2993 > > > > > > I suspect not given the name of the reporter.

Re: [Scons-dev] tools and testing

It might be. I submitted a fix for 1924 as PR 304. That should have been merged... On Apr 21, 2017 2:17 PM, "Bill Deegan" wrote: :) Sounds good. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:36 -0700, Bill

Re: [Scons-dev] D tool development workflow

Ha, I can hardly call myself a "core activist" anymore, but thanks. :-) On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 12:55 -0400, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > > > […] > > > > I would be so happy about this. I would gladly volunteer to help.

[Scons-dev] buildbot down for upgrade

http://buildbot.scons.org down for upgrade to buildbit 0.9.6 ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev