On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Featherstone
andrew.featherst...@cantab.net wrote:
On 17/08/14 22:36, Dirk Bächle wrote:
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been running here in the last
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Kenny, Jason L jason.l.ke...@intel.com wrote:
On the slots usage.
I believe for me the value of slots was that it reduced memory a lot. I
posted tests some time ago to show this. Ideally I would be a fan of python
cleaning this up internally, but at the end
We do have continuous measurements of SCons performance and memory use on a
selected set of test cases, at http://buildbot.scons.org/timings/. I'm not
completely sure this is up to date; Bill, do you know?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Kenny, Jason L jason.l.ke...@intel.com
wrote:
The
Gary,
I'll take a look.
This was some of Steven's magic.
The revision numbers look suspect on the latest info in the graphs though.
-Bill
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com
wrote:
We do have continuous measurements of SCons performance and memory use on
