On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Kenny, Jason L
wrote:
> They used SCons as a bunch of env.Execute() statements. They basically did
> the build during the "read" phase
Eww!
--
Gary
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.
I should add that I know of internally a few projects that moved from SCons to
make/automake/cmake.
The reason was not speed, but understanding and a small functional issue.
These projects did not use my Parts extension, but they would have considered
it, if they knew about it, even then I beli
Just a project I know of that moved to cmake from scons.
Freeorion: http://www.freeorion.org/index.php/Main_Page
-Original Message-
From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] On Behalf Of Dirk Bächle
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:43 PM
To: SCons developer list
Subject: Re:
Anatoly,
please find a few comments below.
On 25.08.2014 10:51, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote:
On 24.08.2014 21:02, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Gary Oberbrunner
wrote:
Then I'd like to revisit Mercurial workflow, b
On 25.08.2014 20:54, Bill Deegan wrote:
Looks like some of the memory clean up may have broken interactive mode.
Take a look at:
http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2971
Yeah, I noticed. I'll contact the user and try to find out what goes
wrong, hopefully resulting in a MWE and addi
Looks like some of the memory clean up may have broken interactive mode.
Take a look at:
http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2971
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Kenny, Jason L
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> We made some types safety tweaks in the subprocess we provided.
>
>
>
> I have
Hi guys,
We made some types safety tweaks in the subprocess we provided.
I have attached it. This is the latest version in Parts open source as well (
ie in truck).
Jason
From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] On Behalf Of Gary
Oberbrunner
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 1:09 PM
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote:
> On 24.08.2014 21:02, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Gary Oberbrunner
>> wrote:
Then I'd like to revisit Mercurial workflow, because we need to clarify
how to
rebase pull requests.
>
> I would r
