Re: [Scons-dev] adding qt4/qt5 to scons-contrib?

Hi Mats, I'm basically fine with this. Some while ago the idea was even to integrate the qt4/qt5 Tools to the scons-core directly...this would work for me, too. If you need additional support from my side, please let me know. Best regards, Dirk On 17.05.21 19:09, Mats Wichmann wrote: Just

Re: [Scons-dev] scons: path-like objects

Hi Mats, On 04.09.19 19:29, Mats Wichmann wrote: does anyone think it is important to examine scons for support of Python path-like objects? I think this is important enough to put some research effort in it. But only if we're talking about the FS-centric Node classes "Node.FS.Base" and

Re: [Scons-dev] bug prune

Hi, this approach sounds good to me too. I just wanted to mention that I have all the old Tigris Issues (and user and developer mails) archived on my local machine. They're stored in a simple text-ish format that can be read into corresponding Python classes. My plan is still to write a small

Re: [Scons-dev] should src/engine/SCons/Tool/docbook/util/* be included in the packages?

Hi Bill, Am 07.10.2018 um 21:44 schrieb Bill Deegan: Are the docbook xslt stylesheets we're currently including reasonably available from distro's repos? I haven't checked yet, but my guess is that some version would be offered in the major distros. But the problem is then that different

Re: [Scons-dev] should src/engine/SCons/Tool/docbook/util/* be included in the packages?

Hi there, and sorry for the late answer... On 06.10.2018 06:26, Bill Deegan wrote: Strange that it's referring to "/usr/lib/scons/SCons/Tool/docbook/utils/xmldepend.xsl",  it should be referring to build/... for the unpacked version of the package. Have you run python bootstrap.py first? On

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons moves to GitHub! https://github.com/SConsProject/scons

Anatoly, this isn't quite correct. The figures you show here are for - removing the docbook folder, AND - compressing the repository. Your pastebin shows that you don't run a compression *before* removing docbook. If I do a fresh checkout: git clone

Re: [Scons-dev] **JUNK** Re: SCons, Mercurial, BitBucket, Git, and GitHub

Hi all, On 31.08.2017 08:27, Dirk Bächle wrote: Bill, [...] True. This can also happen after the initial migration. Dirk - is it simple to grab the various attachments from tigris? I'd say so, yes. Let me dig up the sources for that, which might take a day or two. please find

Re: [Scons-dev] **JUNK** Re: SCons, Mercurial, BitBucket, Git, and GitHub

Bill, On 31.08.2017 02:46, Bill Deegan wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Gaurav Juvekar > wrote: Hi, [...] Couldn't the patches be re-uploaded as gists and then linked from within the GitHub issue?

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons, Mercurial, BitBucket, Git, and GitHub

Bill, On 29.08.2017 22:14, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Does the script migrate attachments? yes, it also downloads all attachments. But, as mentioned in my other post, you can't upload them directly to Github. :( And we might create the issues one-by-one in their natural order as you

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons, Mercurial, BitBucket, Git, and GitHub

Hi Tim, On 29.08.2017 17:02, Tim Jenness wrote: If you can add labels during the import then you could conceivably add age-based labels such as “ancient”, “1year”, “2years” or whatever. Then you would be able to get some feel for which ones are the old ones that have been lingering. That

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons, Mercurial, BitBucket, Git, and GitHub

Hi Russel, On 28.08.2017 09:43, Russel Winder wrote: [...] The question then has to be how to bring the issues from Tigris to GitHub. GitHub issues has an API. If Tigris Issues also has an API then it is a question of writing a program, I guess in Python3, since that is likely easier than

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations

Hi there, On 21.07.2017 17:39, Andrew C. Morrow wrote: Hi scons-dev - The following is a revised draft of an email that I had originally intended to send as a follow up to https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/2017-June/006018.html. Instead, Bill Deegan and I took some time to

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations

On 24.07.2017 23:29, Bill Deegan wrote: As Jason said, if you run a profile on a reasonable sized build the MD5'ing doesn't really show much % of runtime. Unless your project is called "MongoDB". ;) Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list

Re: [Scons-dev] D support, not sure what to do

Hi Russel, hi Jean-Baptiste, thanks a lot for starting and chiming in on this topic, which I think is an important one. When I read Russel's other (opinionated) post about how D is likely to gain more ground than Rust/Python in the future, I asked myself: What can we possibly do to support

Re: [Scons-dev] Why are Builders excluded from env.Clone()?

Hi Jonathon, On 09.12.2016 18:03, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: [...] This behavior does appear to be intentional, however: builders = self._dict.get('BUILDERS', {}) clone = copy.copy(self) # BUILDERS is not safe to do a simple copy clone._dict = semi_deepcopy_dict(self._dict,

[Scons-dev] Must...watch...Python

Hi there, the winter holidays are coming, with all its long evenings in front of a fireplace...or the internet. If you should ever get tired of "funny cats" videos or "React to" episodes, why not treat yourself to a heavy overdose of Python? ;) Just found this repo, have a look:

Re: [Scons-dev] The Contrib Repository. [was Adding support for Visual Studio Code workspace generation]

Andrew, On 28.11.2016 23:29, Andrew Featherstone wrote: On 28/11/16 21:09, Dirk Bächle wrote: [...] My plan was simply to put something alongside the existing tools in src/engine/SCons/Tool/ . "community supported" is a bit of an odd thing to me. Just developing in one place wou

Re: [Scons-dev] The Contrib Repository. [was Adding support for Visual Studio Code workspace generation]

Hi, here are my 2c... ;) On 28.11.2016 10:36, Russel Winder wrote: On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 12:42 -0800, Bill Deegan wrote: Andrew, If it's interesting to you, go ahead and work on it! There's an index of community supported builders in the wiki. Feel free to add your work there

Re: [Scons-dev] Anyone heard of or using Cuppa?

Hi there, On 16.11.2016 16:07, Bill Deegan wrote: Just got a query on the IRC channel and hadn't heard of it myself. Interesting. https://github.com/ja11sop/cuppa , yes...I heard about it before (found it googling on youtube for "SCons" related stuff):

[Scons-dev] Announcement: Break for my BuildBot slaves...

Hi there, just wanted to let you know: my BuildBot slaves will stay down for another month or so. I bought a house and will move there during the next month, so I hope to be able to revive them around mid of November. I'll probably stay very quiet on the mailing lists as well (StackOverflow is

Re: [Scons-dev] scons --tree=status raises an exception

Hi Joel, On 29.09.2016 16:25, Joel Ostraat wrote: I chatted with Bill Deegan on IRC yesterday. He encouraged me to file a bug report (http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3033) and ask how this might be fixed. To reiterate my thoughts and questions from the bug report: Looking

Re: [Scons-dev] Python 2to3

On 22.09.2016 19:21, William Blevins wrote: The current PR is from default; I'm just using bookmarks. Sorry, I hadn't noticed...all the better then. ;) Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org

Re: [Scons-dev] Python 2to3

On 22.09.2016 18:40, Dirk Bächle wrote: Hi William, On 22.09.2016 05:39, William Blevins wrote: Administrators, I have a lot of stuff in that PR now. Look at it and decide if it's fine. this looks great! Let's merge it as is, and then continue by opening another branch right away

Re: [Scons-dev] Python 2to3

Hi William, On 22.09.2016 05:39, William Blevins wrote: Administrators, I have a lot of stuff in that PR now. Look at it and decide if it's fine. this looks great! Let's merge it as is, and then continue by opening another branch right away. Regarding the "fixture"s, it's okay with me if

Re: [Scons-dev] Scons-dev Digest, Vol 57, Issue 9

Hi Oleg, thanks a lot for taking the time to write up your questions and suggestions. I'm really interested in hearing more about how you think SCons could be improved. You'll find some specific questions and comments inline below... Please bear in mind that SCons is a file-centric build

Re: [Scons-dev] User-guide generation

Hi William, On 21.08.2016 17:53, William Blevins wrote: [...] I would argue that "the normal user" never runs the document building scripts, so I don't see how that applies. it applies because the building scripts, and the Doc toolchain, around it is especially designed and setup such that

Re: [Scons-dev] User-guide generation

Hi William, On 20.08.2016 00:22, William Blevins wrote: Dirk, ... Right and I understand that there is documentation, and I use it when I have an issue. The problem that I have is that I have worked with the docs more than most (outside the maintainer team), and I always seem to forget

Re: [Scons-dev] User-guide generation

William, On 19.08.2016 13:14, William Blevins wrote: Dirk, Apparently, the user guide data doesn't regenerate unless you call: python bin/docs-update-generated.py python bin/docs-validate.py python bin/docs-create-example-outputs.py I guess it just doesn't make a lot

Re: [Scons-dev] User-guide generation

Hi William, I hope you don't mind since we're among developers here, but I think it's fair to apply the same rules to everyone. So I'm treating this the same as on the user list. Please tell us which commands exactly you have run, and which parts of the documentation you follow as reference.

Re: [Scons-dev] Fwd: [Scons-users] Performance of version 2.5.0 vs 2.3.0 on Windows host dropped significantly

On 16.08.2016 18:36, Bill Deegan wrote: Will do. I'm trying to fix buildbot.scons.org/timings as since the switch from SVN to mercurial the revision numbers change to sha hashs and screwed up the display. If Henrik's example provides a differing data point

Re: [Scons-dev] Builder with custom decider and non-file based target

Hi Oleg, On 04.08.2016 13:55, Left Right wrote: Hello list. I'm trying to come up with a builder for Docker images. Docker images are built based on a Dockerfile template and a bunch of other sources one way or another related to the template. The output, however, isn't a file strictly

Re: [Scons-dev] Proposal for SCons documentation on StackOverflow...

MAN page and User's Guide as published by the project (see also http://www.scons.org)." , or something similar. Regards, Dirk On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de <mailto:tshor...@gmx.de>> wrote: Bill, On 31.07.2016 23 <tel:31.07.2016%2023>:17, B

Re: [Scons-dev] Proposal for SCons documentation on StackOverflow...

Bill, On 31.07.2016 23:17, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de <mailto:tshor...@gmx.de>> wrote: [...] We need someway to indicate on stackoverflow that this is the intent or we'll get mired in a confusing mass of people e

Re: [Scons-dev] Proposal for SCons documentation on StackOverflow...

On 31.07.2016 14:26, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Looks like I was the final vote! Awesome! Big thanks to everyone who gave his vote! Regards, Dirk On Jul 30, 2016 7:35 AM, "Dirk Bächle" <tshor...@gmx.de <mailto:tshor...@gmx.de>> wrote: Hi there, for the

[Scons-dev] Proposal for SCons documentation on StackOverflow...

Hi there, for the beta phase of the new StackOverflow documentation, SCons is now also proposed...to make this happen we need 5 committers accepting the proposal. Two (myself included) have already given their vote, and it would be cool if anyone who's active in StackOverflow clicks the

Re: [Scons-dev] no more print statements in SConscripts?

Hi there, On 26.05.2016 03:52, Jason Kenny wrote: I am unclear on what people are suggesting as fixes to the issue. However I believe we tweak the way we “load” the Sconstruct we can control which print logic is used when python 2.7 is used. I don’t believe there is any way to allow the

Re: [Scons-dev] no more print statements in SConscripts?

Hi Gary, On 25.05.2016 14:59, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Hi folks; I know I've been out of the loop recently, lots going on. Great work getting the python 3 stuff in! I did just try the default branch (with python2.7 on Windows) and I notice print statements (not the function, just the

Re: [Scons-dev] python3-port branch merged to default and then closed

On 24.05.2016 20:04, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Please do. Probably the right place to post this issue anyway.. Maybe I'll sign up for the list. Assuming it's fairly high traffic? That's right...I'll probably unsubscribe soon, but haven't decided yet. Dirk

Re: [Scons-dev] python3-port branch merged to default and then closed

Hi there, On 24.05.2016 10:54, Alexandre Feblot wrote: Hi, definitely not a guru. I did this once, which was enough to get a python file loaded, and access its classes: import importlib.machinery my_module = importlib.machinery.SourceFileLoader('my_module',

Re: [Scons-dev] Hg vs Git

Hi Mark, On 10.05.2016 04:21, Mark A. Flacy wrote: Hmm. I've used (in order, more or less), PLS (which I expect nobody to know), Clearcase, RCS, CVS, Arch, TLA, HG, BZR, and Git. I won't claim to have used svn in any real sense. The first 4 of that list were centralized version control

Re: [Scons-dev] Hg vs Git

Hi there, On 09.05.2016 16:57, Rob Boehne wrote: For me, scons is the ONLY project I work on that uses Mercurial, and having to translate each and every command is a real pain. I¹ve also NOT contributed back many changes I¹ve made to get Python to build properly on old UNIX systems, primarily

Re: [Scons-dev] User Guide and Other Release Documents

William, On 16.04.2016 22:43, William Blevins wrote: Bill, http://scons.org/doc/production/HTML/scons-user.html Just search for ptomulik; it's everywhere. I count 6 occurrences...which doesn't qualify as "everywhere" to me. ;) Even more important, those strings are simply given in the

Re: [Scons-dev] Two questions…

Hi, On 14.04.2016 18:48, Bill Deegan wrote: Russel, [...] Oh and… 3. Is there any reason why we should not switch from DocBook/XML to Asciidoctor for all the documentation? I'd like to postpone any discussion of the doc toolchain until after we get the python 3 work done,

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons PDF docs

Hi Bill, On 11.04.2016 23:43, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk or anyone else super familiar with the doc toolchain, Is it possible to generate the docs with PDF bookmarks? (something like this : http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/PdfBookmarks.html) It would be great to be able to navigate more

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Hi Russel, On 10.04.2016 13:10, Russel Winder wrote: The python3-port currently has: 47 test fails 108 no results [...] Sorry I didn't get much done on this over the last 12 weeks, long (and tedious) story – which no-one is interested in. you have done a lot...by starting the task and

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

Hi, On 10.04.2016 20:56, Bill Deegan wrote: All, Here's what I propose. 1. Merge scons_python3 down to default. It's o.k if it's broken for a bit. We can always do bug fixes out of rel_2.5.0 branch if needed and merge those down. 2. I'm o.k. with many tests failing when merged down to

Re: [Scons-dev] scons-2.5.0 performance issue?

Hi Thomas, On 11.04.2016 16:59, Thomas Berg wrote: Bill, below is the output of --debug=count, it is identical with scons-2.4.1 and scons-2.5.0. Since my case was about the no-op build (nothing is built), less parallelization should not be an issue. ... if you haven't already done so, you

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

Hi Anatoly, On 01.02.2016 20:14, anatoly techtonik wrote: Hi, There is an interesting thread, which needs some consensus. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/302/change-the-cache-to-use-2-character/ "consensus" between whom? And what is your concrete idea about how this

Re: [Scons-dev] Missing Wiki page on pkg-config

Hi, On 31.01.2016 13:23, anatoly techtonik wrote: Hi, https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/ParseConfig is missing, referenced from https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/UsingPkgConfig hint: ParseConfig is described in the UserGuide. Best regards, Dirk By the way, is there a tool for

Re: [Scons-dev] Python 3 strategy

Hi there, On 25.01.2016 10:39, Russel Winder wrote: I am having difficulty making a decision… The earlier Python 3 branch is founded on using six. At the time a good decision. Now however we have agreed that 2.7 is the base version and thus future rather than six is the better tool for Python

Re: [Scons-dev] Python3 activity

Hi Vasily, On 25.01.2016 21:39, Vasily wrote: Any answer to my question about the place and approach for stubprocess to live in? Thanks, Vasily 16 янв. 2016 г. 0:17 пользователь "Vasily" > написал: I have started looking into the

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

Hi Gary, On 10.01.2016 16:05, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de <mailto:tshor...@gmx.de>> wrote: On 09.01.2016 20:47, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, For me, its "pain in having to remember how to do things i

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Hi there, On 10.01.2016 20:47, Bill Deegan wrote: Try adding: gettext-base to resolve the skipped gettext tests rpm to resolve skipped rpm tests flex to resolve lex.. I think that's all the ones I'm sure of. Dirk - Sugguestions on how to get the TEX and DocBook ones running? looks like

Re: [Scons-dev] Trial SCons migration to git on github

Hi, On 06.01.2016 22:16, Jason Kenny wrote: I have done the opposite myself ( moved code from guthub to bitbucket) it is very easy either direction. However I have to ask. Is this about moving to Git from HG or to Github? I think these are two different questions. I would also like to make

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Hi Sanjeev, On 03.01.2016 17:22, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: Hi, I know of scons through the gpsd project. Would you be interested in an ubuntu-next buildbot? I run some servers and desktops updating daily from 16.04-proposed. This might be of interest because you will be able to see issues that

Re: [Scons-dev] Rumour…

Hi there, On 05.01.2016 18:25, Bill Deegan wrote: Not a rumor. ;) http://lwn.net/Articles/669924/ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/150459/focus=150960 when I read those two threads/articles it doesn't seem to be about "moving Python to Github"...they're considering (PEP481)

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

Anatoly, Am 28.12.2015 um 15:33 schrieb anatoly techtonik: [...] I'm not sure why you're objecting to this unless you think you are likely to violate a CoC.. Because following CoC makes people CoC-followers, which is offensive for some. Don't be a jerk rule is good enough and the rules should

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons website

Hi Bill, On 27.12.2015 23:30, Bill Deegan wrote: All, I've made a few more changes. Thoughts? http://scons.org/new/ this looks just great to me. I like it a lot, especially compared to the old design. ;) One more suggestion (since you asked for it): Can we add a short paragraph at the

Re: [Scons-dev] Updating roadmap in wiki

Hi, On 27.12.2015 21:49, Bill Deegan wrote: Greetings, I"m doing some updates on the roadmap. Are there any missing items? Any items listed which are already completed? just want to raise attention to the following two pending items (again): - Legal status of SCons foundation (putting it

Re: [Scons-dev] Issue 2494

Hi Adarsh, and thanks for wanting to help out! On 28.12.2015 13:42, Adarsh Sanjeev wrote: Dear developers, I am interested in taking Issue#2494 and am a beginner in contributing to open source. I do not have any experience in doing so. Please advise me on how to proceed. Your first step

Re: [Scons-dev] stubprocess ?

Hi Vasily, On 23.12.2015 22:04, Vasily wrote: Hi Bill and all, Since we (Eugene - added, and me) were original authors, maybe we should work on making a pull request. Can you share the requirements for successful pull request? P.S. I think that making an env opt-out key is hard to do since it

[Scons-dev] A new architecture...

Hi all, the discussions about new features in SCons during the last weeks, have led me to start working on some architectural changes for SCons. They aim at refactoring the module/package structure, such that it's possible to better support customized - Taskmasters - File signature

Re: [Scons-dev] Huge merges in Mercurial

Russel, On 19.12.2015 14:31, Russel Winder wrote: Hi, I tried an experimental merge and much of the stuff looks like it will go straight through. However there is a lot of 3-way meld resolution to be done, hours of it, possibly days. Clearly there is no problem the human taking breaks as long

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Hi all, On 15.12.2015 23:07, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Looks like the pull request blew up windows testing.. http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/builds/257/steps/shell/logs/stdio I fixed the problem directly on the trunk. Buildbots are still running, but it looks much

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Bill, On 15.12.2015 23:07, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Looks like the pull request blew up windows testing.. http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/builds/257/steps/shell/logs/stdio sorry for that. Do you have access to a machine to take a look? I'd have to fire up one of

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Bill, On 15.12.2015 23:07, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Looks like the pull request blew up windows testing.. http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/builds/257/steps/shell/logs/stdio Do you have access to a machine to take a look? just gave this another short look, and I think I

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On 08.12.2015 20:01, anatoly techtonik wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote: As Bill reported, people start to ask for a CoC when looking at a project. What are their motivations? 1. "I am acting according to rules. I want to know if your

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On 08.12.2015 22:36, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Indeed. I think the discussion so far points to let's have one, keep it short & sweet. I don't see any real reasons not to, and some possible benefits to having one. +1, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

Hi all, On 04.12.2015 18:10, Bill Deegan wrote: All, Perhaps it's a good idea to add an official code of conduct for SCons. http://blog.codinghorror.com/the-hugging-will-continue-until-morale-improves/ The following site seems to provide a reasonable code. http://contributor-covenant.org/

Re: [Scons-dev] Code of conduct?

On 07.12.2015 21:35, Alexandre Feblot wrote: Hi, Call me the Grinch, but I have the feeling there are 2 kinds of people in the world: * those who behave naturally, who don't need such written CoC because it is obvious for them, * those who would need it but definitely won't read and consider

Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Would requiring Python 2.7.4 or above be a problem for future release?

On 25.11.2015 22:06, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:36 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: My opinion that Python 3 is a trap. Before going this way and breaking stuff, just try to port anything to this language to see for yourself. Mercurial is still Python 2 and many other tools.

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons on pypy and slots and __class__ assignment

Bill, On 15.11.2015 23:36, Bill Deegan wrote: Greetings, Thought I'd take a whack at running SCons on pypy (based on a presentation at SFPython where the developer say 50x CPython speeds). Anyway it turns out that using __slots__ + assiging to __class__ which we do a few places in the

Re: [Scons-dev] A few tests failing with 2.4.1 package.. Doc issues

Bill, On 09.11.2015 15:45, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Yes switched to a VM running Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS. I made that change and I still get a failure. something's not right here. The log snippet still shows the old (incorrect) order of arguments. Can you check again? See:

Re: [Scons-dev] A few tests failing with 2.4.1 package.. Doc issues

Hi Bill, On 09.11.2015 05:27, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk or someone who is more familiar with the doc toolchain, Can you take a look: https://bitbucket.org/snippets/bdbaddog/X8k98 looks like you now suddenly have a new system with "saxon-xslt"? I probably never got to actually test this

Re: [Scons-dev] Release Schedule

Hi, On 04.11.2015 11:51, William Blevins wrote: Do we have an idea for the release schedule of 2.4.1 and 2.5.0? Looks like pull requests have stabilized and the pile is pretty empty. Might be a good idea to cut 2.4.1. If this isn't a terribly unreasonable request, I would like to see 2.5.0

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

Hi all, On 28.09.2015 14:42, Russel Winder wrote: On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 15:03 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: Maybe worth sticking in a scons bitbucket repo? […] A DVCS repository is indeed where all code belongs :-) the basic part of the import routines is already under DVCS at the

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

Hi Florian, as promised, here's a copy of the converter script in its current state and a short description of the whole conversion process. Have fun with it! ;) Dirk On 25.09.2015 10:55, Florian Miedniak wrote: Dirk, a copy of the script would be nice, so I could have a very first try, if

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons.. the road ahead

Hi there, On 26.09.2015 00:56, Bill Deegan wrote: I guess the question is should that happen in 3.0 branch or default. Since most likely it's in the core and not in the tools, I'm guessing none of the outstanding pull requests will touch that.. I'd like to try and remove some of the "<

Re: [Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

On 24.09.2015 20:01, William Blevins wrote: I took a quick peek. Couldn't log in with demo/demo. I got an invalid page address error. Hmm, don't know...this is new to me. It worked when I tested it from "localhost", I guess that's the difference. Can't do much about it right now, due to a

[Scons-dev] Roundup tracker demo instance...

Hi there, I have imported the current bugs from our Tigris bug tracker (as of 2015-09-22) into a Roundup demo instance. It's running on one of my machines behind a DSL router, and will be available over the weekend at: http://dirkbaechle.dyndns.org:8917/demo/ Please take into account that

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.4.0 Released

Hi all, On 23.09.2015 12:28, Russel Winder wrote: On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 09:13 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: […] I volunteer to weed out some of the old Python 2.x stuff (where x < 7 ;) ) on a separate bug branch. I have all the scons_testsuite stuff ready (just like for the slots cha

Re: [Scons-dev] Atlassian, BitBucket, Mercurial

Hi again, On 23.09.2015 13:45, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 07:08 -0400, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Could be; pretty much _every_ project I can think of is using git now. I have to twist my brain around every time I work on SCons. :-) here are my 2cents regarding changing our

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons 2.4.0 Released

Hi there, On 22.09.2015 05:09, Bill Deegan wrote: William, Sounds good. I'd like to make sure we get some performance profiling before/after such changes to make sure we don't slow SCons down. I volunteer to weed out some of the old Python 2.x stuff (where x < 7 ;) ) on a separate bug

Re: [Scons-dev] Slots ready to release?

Hi guys, On 12.09.2015 22:50, William Blevins wrote: I'm not sure what I am talking about either. I think I got email chains mixed up... I don't see any reasons not to do 2.4.0 with slots. +1 from me...what else? ;) Regards, Dirk ___

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons Node ID

Hi Anatoly, On 04.09.2015 06:16, anatoly techtonik wrote: I have another question about SCons. If I specify target explicitly, it ends up as str in BUILD_TARGETS and it is impossible to traverse. How do I transform it to Node if I don't know the type? I.e. how to lookup Node object by name?

Re: [Scons-dev] Anyone any hints…

Hi, just checked this...and it looks like I forgot to add the "suffix" attribute to the "__getattr__" for backward compatibility. I'll prepare a pull request, which should only take a few minutes. Best regards, Dirk On 01.09.2015 22:18, Dirk Bächle wrote: On 01.09.201

Re: [Scons-dev] Anyone any hints…

On 01.09.2015 22:00, Bill Deegan wrote: Could this be related to the slots change which was merged to default a little while ago? -Bill Judging from the error message, most definitely. ;) Dirk On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Russel Winder

Re: [Scons-dev] Requesting feedback on new website design

Hey Bill, On 08.08.2015 00:21, Bill Deegan wrote: I made a bunch more changes. http://scons.org/new/ The download page isn't quite right yet, but the navigation is pretty much done. feedback? this looks really great now! I like it a lot...and would switch this to live, even though there

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons webpage...

Bill, On 07.08.2015 16:50, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, I'd say keep the docs separate. The pelican stylesheets are actually bootstrap stylesheets. Where/how should we solicit feedback? I didn't think about anything fancy. Just waiting a few hours to see if someone on this dev ML yells bloody

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

William, On 06.08.2015 20:59, William Blevins wrote: Dirk, I don't see information on the hardware and/or threads used for your profile attachment. Also, it is interesting that the update time slightly increased. I assume this is a side-effect of the lazy loading overhead. I am not worried

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

the merge attached. Best regards, Dirk -Bill On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:04 AM, William Blevins wblevins...@gmail.com mailto:wblevins...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds like a plan :) On Aug 6, 2015 3:15 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de mailto:tshor...@gmx.de wrote: Hi

[Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

Hi there, just wanted to let you know that I have prepared a new trunk (default) with the change to slots in the core sources on my local machine. Full testsuite (runtest.py -a) shows no errors on my side...and I'm currently running it through the scons_testsuite

Re: [Scons-dev] Problem using doc toolchain?

Bill, On 01.08.2015 20:23, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, What would be the reason to put slots on 2.4 instead of default branch? If needed we can always branch from 2.3.6 to make a 2.3 branch and patch that. I, personally, am quite confident that merging directly to default should work fine.

Re: [Scons-dev] Problem using doc toolchain?

Bill, On 30.07.2015 17:36, Bill Deegan wrote: From the code I've looked at if you have libxml2 libxslt that is preferred, and then if not it will use lxml. your assumption is correct, this is done because libxml2 is faster in general. It seems that libxml2 and pure lxml have different

Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support

Hi guys, sorry for chiming in so late. On 28.07.2015 23:44, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Yes, that's how we've done it in the past. Sounds like doing it at the same time as slots would be perfect. Doing this in parallel with the slots change sounds good to me too. +1 -- Gary On Tue, Jul 28,

Re: [Scons-dev] Adding Visual Studio 2015 Support to SCons

Bill, On 15.07.2015 23:51, Bill Deegan wrote: Rob, Thanks for the pull request. I looked at it yesterday. I was just refreshing my memory what tests we had for supporting each version of visual studio. just a short question regarding the release schedule: It has been a while since the

Re: [Scons-dev] Repo not wiki for tools and add-ons

Hi Russel, On 05.07.2015 20:57, Russel Winder wrote: On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 11:22 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: […] https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons-contrib/admin/access thanks a lot for creating this Bill. Indeed, I think we can get some capital out of this initiative. […] I would

Re: [Scons-dev] Repo not wiki for tools and add-ons

Hi, On 04.07.2015 20:46, Russel Winder wrote: On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 13:17 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: Russel, I've created: https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons-contrib/admin/access thanks a lot for creating this Bill. [...] Would it be worth having 3 base dirs: tools scripts docs ? I

Re: [Scons-dev] Release 2.3.5

Bill, On 23.06.2015 01:27, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, If I build docs with system python it works fine. If I install libxml2-python it still failes with zero length files. If I uninstall lxml and run it again I get: [...] O.k. got it. Needed to also install libxslt. Probably need to figure

Re: [Scons-dev] Release 2.3.5

Bill, On 22.06.2015 23:13, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Here's log: https://pastebin.mozilla.org/8837564 thanks...looks like the lxml-Python branch of the doc toolchain doesn't work correctly. Can you install the python-libxml2 binding additionally and try again? Dirk

  1   2   3   4   >