Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-25 Thread Dirk Bächle
Russel, On 25.02.2015 07:55, Russel Winder wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 21:57 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: […] here's a follow-up question: Having the Buildbots in place again, I'd like to start a named branch for the switch to __slots__ in the Node class. By keeping this in an isolated

Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-24 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi all On 23.02.2015 07:09, Bill Deegan wrote: Greetings, With help from Dirk and Russel we're green (no failures in runtest.py) on all buildbot slaves. I'd like to suggest that going forward any failures after a patch must be fixed before any other patch is applied. Any objections? -Bill

Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-24 Thread Bill Deegan
Dirk, That sounds fine with me. I'll take a look at our buildbot logic and get that branch to also build on all the build slaves. Let me know when you've created the branch and it's in the scons/scons repo. -Bill On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: Hi all

Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-23 Thread Dirk Bächle
On 23.02.2015 09:20, Russel Winder wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 09:11 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: […] Relatively straightforward with Git, seemingly quite painful with Mercurial. On the other hand I am not one of the gatekeepers… Just to be fair, this isn't really Mercurial's fault...but more

Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-23 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Managan, Rob manag...@llnl.gov wrote: Is there any simple way to have people run their bitbucket repo on the buildbots before the pull request is accepted? https://drone.io/bitbucket.org/techtonik/scons This one is easy to setup, but we need to find a way to

Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-23 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi there, On 23.02.2015 08:28, Russel Winder wrote: On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 22:09 -0800, Bill Deegan wrote: Greetings, With help from Dirk and Russel we're green (no failures in runtest.py) on all buildbot slaves. I'd like to suggest that going forward any failures after a patch must be fixed

Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-23 Thread Russel Winder
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 09:11 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: […] I have basically no objections, but instead of bloating up the testing workflow even more, we should keep it at a sane level. It should be allowed for a patch+test to turn one or several buildbots red. But then, fixing this problem

Re: [Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-22 Thread Russel Winder
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 22:09 -0800, Bill Deegan wrote: Greetings, With help from Dirk and Russel we're green (no failures in runtest.py) on all buildbot slaves. I'd like to suggest that going forward any failures after a patch must be fixed before any other patch is applied. Any

[Scons-dev] All green in buildbot land..

2015-02-22 Thread Bill Deegan
Greetings, With help from Dirk and Russel we're green (no failures in runtest.py) on all buildbot slaves. I'd like to suggest that going forward any failures after a patch must be fixed before any other patch is applied. Any objections? -Bill ___