Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-07 Thread Kenny, Jason L
] On Behalf Of anatoly techtonik Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 11:23 AM To: SCons developer list Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic? On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Kenny, Jason L jason.l.ke...@intel.commailto:jason.l.ke...@intel.com wrote: The current way is to get a source dist and install

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-07 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com wrote: Anatoly, On non-windows platforms the current recommendation is download the .tgz, unpack, python setup.py it. That is certainly more complicated than: pip install scons. `sudo pip install scons` FWIW, and the

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-03 Thread Kenny, Jason L
functional options to provide. Jason From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Feblot Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:45 AM To: SCons developer list Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic? Hi, On environments where there is no internet access (banks, army

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-03 Thread Alexandre Feblot
] On Behalf Of Alexandre Feblot Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:45 AM To: SCons developer list Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic? Hi, On environments where there is no internet access (banks, army, ...), or if scons needs to be internally patched before being installed, the current way

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-03 Thread William Blevins
it work with pip just means we have more functional options to provide. Jason *From:* Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] *On Behalf Of *Alexandre Feblot *Sent:* Friday, April 3, 2015 4:45 AM *To:* SCons developer list *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-02 Thread Bill Deegan
Anatoly, On non-windows platforms the current recommendation is download the .tgz, unpack, python setup.py it. That is certainly more complicated than: pip install scons. -Bill On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:43 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Bill

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-02 Thread Kenny, Jason L
this idea is easy on windows, hard on linux. Jason From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] On Behalf Of anatoly techtonik Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:43 AM To: SCons developer list Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic? On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Bill Deegan b

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-01 Thread Bill Deegan
Jason, I'm in agreement. I think it would be great if the primary way for users to install SCons was via pip (and virtualenv if they like, which I do). I've been (as time allows) looking at the current setup logic and trying to understand it's purposes. I think it should be possible to provide

Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-04-01 Thread Bill Deegan
it if it is not there. The wheel format seems to be the replacement for egg and has a standard PEP behind it. Jason *From:* Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] *On Behalf Of *Bill Deegan *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2015 10:22 AM *To:* SCons developer list *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic

[Scons-dev] Packaging logic?

2015-03-31 Thread Kenny, Jason L
Hi guys, I been fixing up Parts packaging logic so it is pip and wheel friendly. I was wonder what are the plans for SCons on this front? It seems to me that this should not be that complex for us to do in SCons. I just noticed there is a lot of work going on in the current scripts with