On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 24.08.2014 21:02, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com
wrote:
Then I'd like to revisit Mercurial workflow, because we need to clarify
how to
rebase pull
To: Dirk Bächle; SCons developer list
Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] catching up
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Dirk Bächle
tshor...@gmx.demailto:tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the threads
:* Re: [Scons-dev] catching up
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been running here in the last couple of weeks
On 25.08.2014 20:54, Bill Deegan wrote:
Looks like some of the memory clean up may have broken interactive mode.
Take a look at:
http://scons.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2971
Yeah, I noticed. I'll contact the user and try to find out what goes
wrong, hopefully resulting in a MWE and
Anatoly,
please find a few comments below.
On 25.08.2014 10:51, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 24.08.2014 21:02, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com
wrote:
Then I'd
: [Scons-dev] catching up
Anatoly,
please find a few comments below.
On 25.08.2014 10:51, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 24.08.2014 21:02, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Gary Oberbrunner
ga
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Kenny, Jason L jason.l.ke...@intel.com
wrote:
They used SCons as a bunch of env.Execute() statements. They basically did
the build during the read phase
Eww!
--
Gary
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been running here in the last couple of weeks; if there
are things that should be
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 3:02 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am not sure we need to do checkpoint releases anymore. It is already
possible to run SCons from source, so hg clone and run should be enough
to test.
I agree with this. We can probably at least use a bookmark so
Hi there,
On 24.08.2014 21:02, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com wrote:
[...]
Then I'd like to revisit Mercurial workflow, because we need to clarify how to
rebase pull requests.
I would really like to understand why we need a
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Featherstone
andrew.featherst...@cantab.net wrote:
On 17/08/14 22:36, Dirk Bächle wrote:
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been running here in the last
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Kenny, Jason L jason.l.ke...@intel.com wrote:
On the slots usage.
I believe for me the value of slots was that it reduced memory a lot. I
posted tests some time ago to show this. Ideally I would be a fan of python
cleaning this up internally, but at the end
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been running here in the last couple of weeks; if there
are things that should be addressed please bring them up.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
Making this a little more complete:
- patch/bug release 2.3.3? (fix for D tools)
- Node class patch (switch to __slots__)
Will that be really useful?
http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2014/8/16/the-python-i-would-like-to-see/
-
Hi Anatoly,
On 18.08.2014 18:52, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
Making this a little more complete:
- patch/bug release 2.3.3? (fix for D tools)
- Node class patch (switch to __slots__)
Will that be really useful?
On 17/08/14 22:36, Dirk Bächle wrote:
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of
the threads that have been running here in the last couple of weeks;
if there are things that should be addressed please bring them up.
As for
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been running here in the last couple of weeks; if there
are things that should be addressed please bring them up.
As for dev priorities, I think we have two big important projects (not
counting releasing
On 17.08.2014 20:54, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
There's probably not much point in my trying to respond to many of the
threads that have been running here in the last couple of weeks; if
there are things that should be addressed please bring them up.
As for dev priorities, I think we have two
19 matches
Mail list logo
