On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:17 PM, William Blevins wrote:
> I don't see how adding a python extension to a python script is a kludge.
Strictly speaking, you can't execute SConstruct with a Python
interpreter, so it is
not a Python script. Also, if you rename it to SConstruct.py, then
SCons won't be
I don't see how adding a python extension to a python script is a kludge.
If anything, it is stranger that SCons scripts do not have their own
extension (E.G. *.scons). I understand that make may have started the
trend, but that doesn't make it an lead worth following.
V/R,
William
On Jan 28, 20
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 23 January 2015 at 17:02, Carnë Draug wrote:
>> On 21 January 2015 at 19:55, Bill Deegan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Carnë Draug
>>> wrote:
On 21 January 2015 at 13:28, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 21 Janua
On 23 January 2015 at 17:02, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 21 January 2015 at 19:55, Bill Deegan wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Carnë Draug
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 January 2015 at 13:28, Carnë Draug wrote:
>>> > On 21 January 2015 at 13:15, Gary Oberbrunner
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Carnë Draug
> wrote:
>>
>> what if the magic uses the following globs for filenames "SConstruct",
>> "SConscript", and "SConscript.*" ?
>
> These seem good to me. I think a few people may use *.scons, but
On 21 January 2015 at 19:55, Bill Deegan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Carnë Draug
> wrote:
>>
>> On 21 January 2015 at 13:28, Carnë Draug wrote:
>> > On 21 January 2015 at 13:15, Gary Oberbrunner
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Carnë Draug
>> >> wrote:
I looked at your patch. Looks good. Only thought I had was you could
probably have much more trivial files as the test files.
-Bill
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Carnë Draug
wrote:
> On 21 January 2015 at 13:28, Carnë Draug wrote:
> > On 21 January 2015 at 13:15, Gary Oberbrunner
> wrote:
On 21 January 2015 at 13:28, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 21 January 2015 at 13:15, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Carnë Draug
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> >>> scons [1] is a build system and I was thinking of adding it to
>>> >>> shared-mime-info. Its files are very sim
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Carnë Draug
wrote:
>
> what if the magic uses the following globs for filenames "SConstruct",
> "SConscript", and "SConscript.*" ?
These seem good to me. I think a few people may use *.scons, but that's
probably not popular enough to deserve going into shared-m
On 21 January 2015 at 13:15, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Carnë Draug
> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> >>> scons [1] is a build system and I was thinking of adding it to
>> >>> shared-mime-info. Its files are very simple to identify, they are
>> >>> always named SConstruct o
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Carnë Draug
wrote:
> ...
> >>> scons [1] is a build system and I was thinking of adding it to
> >>> shared-mime-info. Its files are very simple to identify, they are
> >>> always named SConstruct or SConscript. These files are also valid
> >>> python scripts.
>
On 21 January 2015 at 09:56, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 05:58:53PM +, Carnė Draug a écrit :
>>
>> scons [1] is a build system and I was thinking of adding it to
>> shared-mime-info. Its files are very simple to identify, they are
>> always named SConstruct or SConscript.
On 21 January 2015 at 01:48, Bill Deegan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:28 PM, William Blevins
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Carnë Draug
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> scons [1] is a build system and I was thinking of adding it to
>>> shared-mime-info. Its files are very
What would be the benefit of doing such?
_Bill
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:28 PM, William Blevins
wrote:
> Technically, they are just python scripts, but it's not my call to make,
> so hopefully a senior dev will chime in :)
>
> SConstruct is a required name, but SConscript is not even though it
Technically, they are just python scripts, but it's not my call to make, so
hopefully a senior dev will chime in :)
SConstruct is a required name, but SConscript is not even though it may be
the standard/convention. The subscripts can use any name you like
technically. I usually include the "*.p
Hi
scons [1] is a build system and I was thinking of adding it to
shared-mime-info. Its files are very simple to identify, they are
always named SConstruct or SConscript. These files are also valid
python scripts.
Should shared-mime-info identify them (I can submit a git patch, no
problem) or s
16 matches
Mail list logo
