I have a need to allow some external process actions to be scheduled which
themselves run with multiple threads, and I would like to adjust scons
to take this into account when running jobs in parallel (e.g. num_jobs=4).
Initial tests suggest that the following crude hack is effective at limiting
ires less threads versus
> waiting for X-threads to be available?
>
> V/R,
> William
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:06 PM, James Corey wrote:
>>
>> I have a need to allow some external process actions to be scheduled which
>> themselves run with multiple t
Could be an anti-feature if people type -j without a number when they
don't mean to...
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:22 AM, William Blevins wrote:
> Russel,
>
> Depends. If I remember correctly, '-j' with no options just means unlimited
> jobs. I don't know how often that is actually useful.
>
> V/R,
Yes, that test also fails for me, on debian and fedora.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 3:14 PM, William Blevins wrote:
> It appears that the pickle patch from earlier this week is causing a test
> failure.
>
> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/348/centralize-the-preferred-pickle-protocol/
