Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Bill, I pushed up that change to the fixtures location and cleaned up most of the "wrapper.py" duplicate code. This weekend I will skim through Tim's changes and pick up anything I missed. V/R, William On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William Blevins wrote: > Right.

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Right. That was intentional. I assume by composing you mean all matches and not just the first. You fine with the global fixture location I picked? Perhaps it's better under the test directory. On Sep 23, 2016 9:38 PM, "Bill Deegan" wrote: Both options stop at the

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Both options stop at the first matched directory, if I'm reading the code correctly. As opposed to composing them. Either way the code you have does add additional flexibility, and is good enough for now. So go ahead and add a pull request? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:23 PM, William Blevins

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Yes. It should work like that for file_fixture and similarly for dir_fixture but takes the whole directory obviously. On Sep 23, 2016 6:07 PM, "Bill Deegan" wrote: > Dir 1: > Files: > a > b > c > > > Dir 2: > Files: > a > d > > Dir 3: > Files: > a > d > f > > > If

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Dir 1: Files: a b c Dir 2: Files: a d Dir 3: Files: a d f If fixture dirs = [1,2,3] fixture dir should end up as: Files: a (dir 1) b (dir 1) c (dir 1) d (dir 2) f (dir 3) So like a series of overlays where first has priority. This is similar to how some MVC web frameworks work. On Fri,

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Bill, You might need to give me an example for the directory comment. I'm not sure I follow. V/R, William On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > O.k so for files it looks good. > > For directories, there's no way to overlay a directory with files from

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

O.k so for files it looks good. For directories, there's no way to overlay a directory with files from the next directory in line in the list of fixture dirs, such that the created dir would be the set of all files in all listed fixture dirs? I'm not entirely sure this would be useful though..

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Any thoughts on the actual diff? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > ok. > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:35 PM, William Blevins > wrote: > >> Bill, >> >> The Bitbucket UI doesn't clearly distinguish between bookmarks and >>

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

ok. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:35 PM, William Blevins wrote: > Bill, > > The Bitbucket UI doesn't clearly distinguish between bookmarks and > branches. That diff is between SCons tip and my GLOBAL_FIXTURE bookmark. > > V/R, > William > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:52 PM,

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Bill, The Bitbucket UI doesn't clearly distinguish between bookmarks and branches. That diff is between SCons tip and my GLOBAL_FIXTURE bookmark. V/R, William On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Please don't put these things on branches. >

Re: [Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Please don't put these things on branches. Bookmarks should get you what you need here. When we merge the branches come to scons main repo and then we need to close them out. (this is one (annoying) difference between git and mercurial). -Bill On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:36 AM, William Blevins

[Scons-dev] Extending QMTest fixtures

Team, As Bill and I briefly discussed in a PR, we thought it would be nice if we could have various directories to pull fixtures. I made the locations into a list, and added a global share directory for reusing files that get copy pasta lots. Please take a look at this diff which also includes