Re: [Scons-dev] SCons COM vs COMSTR tests

2016-09-21 Thread William Blevins
Fair enough. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > William, > > I think I disagree. > The ability to set one different from the other should work and should be > tested. > > Though, this really comes from the Action Object.. > > I think ideally we'd be able to easily separate ru

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons COM vs COMSTR tests

2016-09-21 Thread Bill Deegan
William, I think I disagree. The ability to set one different from the other should work and should be tested. Though, this really comes from the Action Object.. I think ideally we'd be able to easily separate running unit tests from the system tests. (Though you can do that by specifying which