Re: [Scottish] The Future of the LUG

2003-12-13 Thread Willie
On Saturday 13 December 2003 15:28, ed wrote: I have no fondness for the Tories either. I only know she is a Psion user because I saw her use on on the Glasgow-Edinburgh train and since I also used a Psion, a 3a compred to her Psion5, I was aware of the difficulties Psion using politicos

Re: [Scottish] The Future of the LUG

2003-12-13 Thread Julian Gibson
Colin McKinnon wrote: The three document management systems I've come across (apologies if I've overlooked someone here Julian) are all intensively Microsoft based. The serious contenders tend to run on a variety of platforms, i.e. Documentum ($500k+): Platforms Supported Windows NT Server 4.0

Re: [Scottish] The Future of the LUG

2003-12-13 Thread Willie
On Saturday 13 December 2003 14:13, Martin Habets wrote: snip And with all the political talk I think we have found a perfect raison d'etre for the Scottish LUG (versus the Glasgow LUG). With SLUG we can have one interface to all of of Scottish politics, and we can all contact our local MSPs.

Re: [Scottish] The Future of the LUG

2003-12-13 Thread ptb
Hallo all : - As an activity/interest group that can't even agree on having any need for a customarily-adequate para-bureaucratic committee component, SLUG would maybe feel out of place dealing with politicians who actually want to govern and are willing to face up to trying to do it. So maybe

Re: [Scottish] The Future of the LUG

2003-12-13 Thread Willie
On Saturday 13 December 2003 23:27, ptb wrote: Hallo all : - As an activity/interest group that can't even agree on having any need for a customarily-adequate para-bureaucratic committee component, SLUG would maybe feel out of place dealing with politicians who actually want to govern and