[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SLUG-list scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Scottish] PPPoE vs PPPoA
Andrew Back wrote:
[snip]
That's what I thought, I.e. that you might only get PPPoE when an ISP has
say taken advantage of LLU. But I have now been
Message -
From: Matt Causey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Phillip Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SLUG-list
scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Scottish] PPPoE vs PPPoA
In my understanding, PPPoE is the newer, more flexible protocol...as it
allows more
Matt Causey wrote:
[snip]
This is when I learned that Tiscali does -not- support PPPoE, but rather
PPPoA. O'course, my Cisco PIX only supports the more flexible PPPoE
method. Grr.
Is this the case with all ISPs here in the UK? Anyone have an old Cisco
ATM device sitting around? :)
Welcome Matt !
I ALSO hail from the Old Country, but have been here nearly 30 years ( ! ) -
Just my 2 cents (ooops! PENCE ! ) - When I was trying to find a way of
connecting to the net (at ALL) a year and a half ago, I picked up a Thomson
Speedtouch modem from someone on Glasgow-Freeshare
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, William Anderson wrote:
Matt Causey wrote:
[snip]
This is when I learned that Tiscali does -not- support PPPoE, but rather
PPPoA. O'course, my Cisco PIX only supports the more flexible PPPoE
method. Grr.
Is this the case with all ISPs here in the UK? Anyone have an
Andrew Back wrote:
[snip]
That's what I thought, I.e. that you might only get PPPoE when an ISP
has say taken advantage of LLU. But I have now been told by two
different people that PPPoE can work, and a quick Google seems to
reinforce this:
The pages you cite are 3-5 years old! :) The
