Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-17 Thread Lawrence Sweeney
On 2003.07.16 10:01 willie fleming wrote: Many users now have 512Mb RAM. Do we really need to allocate 2x RAM for swap? No, not really. The virtual memory subsystem pre ~2.10 mapped your all the contents of RAM onto the swap, so so unless you had more swap than RAM, then in effect you had _no_

Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-17 Thread Lawrence Sweeney
On 2003.07.17 11:08 Lawrence Sweeney wrote: On 2003.07.16 10:01 willie fleming wrote: Many users now have 512Mb RAM. Do we really need to allocate 2x RAM for swap? No, not really. The virtual memory subsystem pre ~2.10 mapped your s/2.10/2.4.10/ sorry :-) ls

Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-16 Thread Kyle Gordon
On a slightly related note, with the new 2.6 kernel you now get suspend to swap. This can be slightly problematic if you have less swap than (in use) RAM I see your point though, 2xRAM swap does seem slightly excessive, and is probably useless, unless you have a laptop that you wish to use

Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-16 Thread scottish+Steven . Murdoch
Talking of which... is there anyway to assign X amount of swap, but only let the kernel use a specific amount? I'm not sure why you would want to do this. Would creating multiple swap partitions but only telling the kernel about some of them do what you want? Steven Murdoch.

Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-16 Thread Kevin McDermott
* Kyle Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 16. 2003 12:15]: On a slightly related note, with the new 2.6 kernel you now get suspend to swap. This can be slightly problematic if you have less swap than (in use) RAM I see your point though, 2xRAM swap does seem slightly excessive, and is

Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-16 Thread Kyle Gordon
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 12:20, Kevin McDermott wrote: * Kyle Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 16. 2003 12:15]: On a slightly related note, with the new 2.6 kernel you now get suspend to swap. This can be slightly problematic if you have less swap than (in use) RAM I see your point

Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-16 Thread Kyle Gordon
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 12:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Talking of which... is there anyway to assign X amount of swap, but only let the kernel use a specific amount? I'm not sure why you would want to do this. Would creating multiple swap partitions but only telling the kernel about some

Re: [Scottish] Swap partitions -- do modern boxen really need them? Discuss

2003-07-16 Thread Miah Gregory
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Kyle Gordon wrote: I'd like to use swsusp to suspend my laptop to disk. However, with 256Mb RAM, and my affection for KDE, I regularly find myself eating into the 256Mb swap that I have. I might, in some instances, be using a total of say, 300Mb, so it attempts to save