[Scottish] For comparing VM technologies: VMKNOPPIX released

2007-03-08 Thread Dan Shearer
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:56:02 +0900 (JST) From: Kuniyasu Suzaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Qemu-devel] VMKNOPPIX is released To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Dear, We released VMKNOPPIX. It was called Xenoppix but renamed to VMKNOPPIX because it became a collection of Virtual Machine Softwares.

Re: [Scottish] For comparing VM technologies: VMKNOPPIX released

2007-03-08 Thread Andrew Back
But where is Linux/390 running under VM on hercules on Linux? :oP A. Andrew Back [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Dan Shearer wrote: Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:56:02 +0900 (JST) From: Kuniyasu Suzaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Qemu-devel] VMKNOPPIX is released To:

Re: [Scottish] For comparing VM technologies: VMKNOPPIX released

2007-03-08 Thread Dan Shearer
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:31:52AM +, Andrew Back wrote: But where is Linux/390 running under VM on hercules on Linux? :oP Can't help with the VM bit (for most people licensing is a problem there) but I'll happily help people who want to add Linux/390 native under Hercules on this image.

Re: [Scottish] For comparing VM technologies: VMKNOPPIX released

2007-03-08 Thread Andrew Back
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Dan Shearer wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:31:52AM +, Andrew Back wrote: But where is Linux/390 running under VM on hercules on Linux? :oP Can't help with the VM bit (for most people licensing is a problem there) but I'll happily help people who want to add

Re: [Scottish] For comparing VM technologies: VMKNOPPIX released

2007-03-08 Thread Dan Shearer
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:17:25PM +, Andrew Back wrote: Comments: - all the others in the image are high-performance, or claim to be (Hercules isn't particularly efficient despite being very solid, and besides all the others are implemented in a like-on-like manner to

Re: [Scottish] For comparing VM technologies: VMKNOPPIX released

2007-03-08 Thread Dan Shearer
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:41:44PM +, Andrew Back wrote: Never heard of DIPOS, does it run under simh by any chance? It is for these reasons that I get annoyed when people talk about Linux/UNIX/OpenVMS doing things the wrong way. Wait, who said which way was right? And just because

Re: [Scottish] For comparing VM technologies: VMKNOPPIX released

2007-03-08 Thread Andrew Back
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Dan Shearer wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:41:44PM +, Andrew Back wrote: Never heard of DIPOS, does it run under simh by any chance? Not that I know of. It ran on a Siemens-Nixdorf device called a TCU, complete with 70Mb full-height 5 1/4 MFM hard drive, a

Re: [Scottish] New Thread: I apologise.....

2007-03-08 Thread William Anderson
William Anderson wrote: babaguy wrote: Dear Alan, and All,Thank you for your encouraging and helpful replies earlier today, which I am trying to follow and use to track down needed information. SORRY to have annoyed you and other SLUGgers - It's really not brain-dump, simply another

Re: [Scottish] rpmdb: DB.LOCK

2007-03-08 Thread Kyle Gordon
On Thursday 08 March 2007 16:55:13 Peter George wrote: Hello, Installing FC6 on a Poweredge 1550, I get about 3% through the installation process and a red bar comes up on the gui installer saying; rpmdb: DB.LOCK - lock_put: LOCK is no longer valid. And the installation fails with a