Re: [Scottish] Cost of M$ in councils.

2011-01-28 Thread Colin Speirs
Hi Dan

On 28 January 2011 07:24, Dan Shearer d...@shearer.org wrote:


 From the perception that Windows is free the line of reasoning follows
 that the bar for Linux is a lot higher, because Windows is compatible
 with everything currently in use. Thus Linux is introducing cost for no
 short-term functional gain.

 Can't speak for Councils, though I work for the SG I shouldn't comment on
their purchasing policies, but my mum works for a Council down south so I'll
throw some  comments at you based on a conversation I had with some of her
colleagues who work in her IT department.

Windows isn't seen as free because of the inclusion with the PC, the
machines are all rebuilt with a standard build. The software in accounted
for by seats and volume licencing.

Windows desktop software has a lot of traction if for no other reason than
the investment the users have made in Excel spreadsheets and macros over the
years. The IT guys like AD stuff, giving them a bewildering level of
control.

The main training expense would be not in training the users, if they can
use Windows they can use Gnome or XFCE, but in the IT folks who would need a
lot of retraining, and a shedload of work trying to recreate their network
in Linux form,


Linux and Unix are in there somewhere, but usually specific servers of tools
with embedded Linux.

Colin
___
Scottish mailing list
Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish


Re: [Scottish] Cost of M$ in councils.

2011-01-28 Thread John Thomson
Hi,

Just to let you know, I could do with some help compiling all the data,
as some is in email, some PDF's and some in an online spreadsheet
(google gocs).

Also, as someone said (sorry, don't have my usual mail client and can't
remember, who, I'm running from pendrive), this could be creative
accounting this is one problem I have faced with around half of the
replies, there has been something along the lines of We cannot give you
the price for M$ software alone, as our invoices include hardware,
software and support. Which suggests that they don't actually keep the
records very accurately. As fr the guy who said that only the IT staff
would need re-trained, I have a figure, quoted from a councilor (in a
related, but not identical incident) that retraining the technical
support team (this is for schools) would cost in the tens of
thousands., which, in my opinion, isn't too bad, considering the same
council (different councilor) stated that M$ cost #600,000 per year.
The first councilor also mentioned a *licensing* price of around #24
per device per annum in schools.

If anyone wants to help, just ask, either way, I will try and get some
details up here and on my website asap.

Thanx, John Thomson.

___
Scottish mailing list
Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish


Re: [Scottish] Cost of M$ in councils.

2011-01-28 Thread Colin Speirs
hey


As fr the guy who said that only the IT staff
 would need re-trained, I have a figure, quoted from a councilor (in a
 related, but not identical incident) that retraining the technical
 support team (this is for schools) would cost in the tens of
 thousands.,

 That was me quoting.

The bloke I spoke to reckoned that most folk in the office used

Word
Excel
Email Client
Web interface
Specific applications, many of which were web based

Since they had been using Office 2003, he thought most would adapt quickly
to OpenOffice

He thought Evolution would not be a hard adapt from Outlook

Firefox wasn't too different from IE and some folk already had it

And the application stuff, that would require some adaptation, but the
majority of it was server based. There would be expenses in fixing some IE
specific javascript.

Since the big changes would be on the server side, he foresaw most of the
training on IT staff and key users who could then travel around and help the
transition

Then he said though that being tied into the technology at the silly level
(Excel mainly) would be a hell of a friction to deal with

col
___
Scottish mailing list
Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish


Re: [Scottish] Cost of M$ in councils.

2011-01-27 Thread Colin McKinnon
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 04:45:19 pm Marcel Hecko wrote:
 I was actually expecting this number to be much higher. Is this only
 software license costs which are accounted into the amount, or is this
 including support and mainetnance fees? It that a flat rate, or
 monthly/yearly cost? I would love to see other inputs/outcomes of the
 project you are mentioning.

 Marcel

Because it makes it difficult to read.

Please don't top post.

I would have expected it to be higher too - based on an estimate for the OEM 
licence of £50 - getting a full set of supported commercial software, and 
client licences for print/file/email/webfiltering for £60 looks like a very 
good deal.

I suspect there's some creative accounting going on here.

C.


___
Scottish mailing list
Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish

Re: [Scottish] Cost of M$ in councils.

2011-01-27 Thread Dan Shearer
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:28:36PM +, John Thomson wrote:

 For the past 3 or so weeks, I have requested details on how much local
 councils all over the UK have been spending on software, compared to
 how many computers they use. 

That's a really interesting project. 

From my enquiries, it seems a lot of Scottish government purchasing is
done on the basis that Windows comes free with the hardware, that is,
buying a bare PC is possible but the cost reduction is minimal (as
expressed to Scottish Government bodies, and then to me.) This is
certainly a widespread perception. A lot of purchasing is not done
centrally, although there are ways councils and other non-centralised
bodies can take advantage of central purchasing. If you have located an
expert on how IT purchases are handled across Scottish government I'd
love to meet them!

From the perception that Windows is free the line of reasoning follows
that the bar for Linux is a lot higher, because Windows is compatible
with everything currently in use. Thus Linux is introducing cost for no
short-term functional gain.

--
Dan Shearer
d...@shearer.org

___
Scottish mailing list
Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish


Re: [Scottish] Cost of M$ in councils.

2011-01-26 Thread Marcel Hecko
I was actually expecting this number to be much higher. Is this only
software license costs which are accounted into the amount, or is this
including support and mainetnance fees? It that a flat rate, or
monthly/yearly cost? I would love to see other inputs/outcomes of the
project you are mentioning.

Marcel

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, John Thomson m...@johnthomson.me.uk wrote:


 Hi,

 I'm new to this mailing list, but I just want to mention a
 project I am working on. For the past 3 or so weeks, I have requested
 details on how much local councils all over the UK have been spending on
 software, compared to how many computers they use. Just to let you know,
 I have roughly calculated that most of the councils are spending, in the
 region, of about £110, per computer. I was just wondering what your
 views are on this. Note, very few have tried any alternatives to
 Windows.

 --
 Thanx, John Thomson.

 ___
 Scottish mailing list
 Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
 https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish



-- 

--
This message is not intended to have
contractual effect
--

___
Scottish mailing list
Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish

Re: [Scottish] Cost of M$ in councils.

2011-01-26 Thread Keith Wyse
On 26 January 2011 16:28, John Thomson m...@johnthomson.me.uk wrote:


 Hi,

 I'm new to this mailing list, but I just want to mention a
 project I am working on. For the past 3 or so weeks, I have requested
 details on how much local councils all over the UK have been spending on
 software, compared to how many computers they use. Just to let you know,
 I have roughly calculated that most of the councils are spending, in the
 region, of about £110, per computer. I was just wondering what your
 views are on this. Note, very few have tried any alternatives to
 Windows.

 --
 Thanx, John Thomson.


From your research would it be possible to determine how much these
councils would save by using FOSS alternatives?
With Westminster and Holyrood opening up to the use of FOSS, and times
so hard, a few more figures might help persuade them.

Cheers
Keith

___
Scottish mailing list
Scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish