Velikanov, Mikhail wrote:
However, I'm beginning to think that the most sensible plan would be
just to upgrade the host-side glibc to a less ancient level.
This won't really prevent this problem from happening, although it'll
probably make it more rare. There is always a chance someone might
co
Jussi,
> The host-side glibc in scratchbox is quite old.
Yes, I believe it's been kept at version 2.3.2 since the early releases
of Scratchbox.
>However, I'm beginning to think that the most sensible plan would be
>just to upgrade the host-side glibc to a less ancient level.
This won't really
Velikanov, Mikhail wrote:
Unfortunately, just copying the binary and the libs it requires under
/host_usr didn't work. When I tried to run it inside Scratchbox, the
default dynamic loader in /scratchbox/host_shared/lib was used to load
the libs, and that produced a bunch of libc version incompati
ols inside Scratchbox?
Best regards,
Mikhail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jussi Hakala
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:48 PM
To: scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org
Subject: Re: [Scratchbox-users] Running dynamic executable under
Or you can try to copy the binary (and additional libraries it needs)
under /host_usr/, in most of the cases, that works too.
Or, you can use a statically linked binary...
Regards,
Jussi
Diane Holt wrote:
You can run statically linked executables inside Scratchbox that were
built outside o
You can run statically linked executables inside Scratchbox that were built
outside of Scratchbox, but to run a dynamically linked executable inside
Scratchbox, you need to build it inside Scratchbox.
Diane
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Velikanov, Mikhail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi all,
