Hi,
On 7/15/22 17:10, Maarten Brock wrote:
Philipp Klaus Krause schreef op 2022-07-15 16:45:
Since people like form 1, I'd now think we should keep it, but drop
#pragma sdcc_hash. That looks like a better way forward and also
solves the issues.
When this pragma is dropped does that mean it
Hello Philipp,
Friday, July 15, 2022, 11:22:39 PM, you wrote:
PKK> Are these two still in use by anyone? The enable a nonstandard behavior in
the preprocessor wrt. parsing of "numbers" (apparently with the option /
pragma, the preprocessor ignores what the standard says about
"preprocessing-nu
Are these two still in use by anyone? The enable a nonstandard behavior
in the preprocessor wrt. parsing of "numbers" (apparently with the
option / pragma, the preprocessor ignores what the standard says about
"preprocessing-numbers" and instead tried to handle them more like later
stages, whic
Philipp Klaus Krause schreef op 2022-07-15 16:45:
Since people like form 1, I'd now think we should keep it, but drop
#pragma sdcc_hash. That looks like a better way forward and also
solves the issues.
When this pragma is dropped does that mean it is no longer possible to
use the # for an im
Since people like form 1, I'd now think we should keep it, but drop
#pragma sdcc_hash. That looks like a better way forward and also
solves the issues.
When this pragma is dropped does that mean it is no longer possible to
use the # for an immediate operand?
You can still use a plain # (
Philipp Klaus Krause schreef op 2022-07-14 21:34:
Am 14.07.22 um 14:46 schrieb Maarten Brock:
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Klaus Krause schreef op 2022-07-14 12:58:
SDCC currently supports two forms of inline assembler:
1:
__asm
asm code here
__endasm;
and
2:
__asm("asm code here");
Does (or will)
