On Sunday 30 March 2014 12:33:44 Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> On 30.03.2014 10:23, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> > Hi again Is there any simple way to exclude the non-free directory
> > from being built? It is quite simple in version 3.3 but I cannot
> > build version 3.4. In order to get the pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.03.2014 10:23, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi again Is there any simple way to exclude the non-free directory
> from being built? It is quite simple in version 3.3 but I cannot
> build version 3.4. In order to get the package into Debian I need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.03.2014 10:23, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi again Is there any simple way to exclude the non-free directory
> from being built? It is quite simple in version 3.3 but I cannot
> build version 3.4. In order to get the package into Debian I need
Hi again
Is there any simple way to exclude the non-free directory from being
built? It is quite simple in version 3.3 but I cannot build version 3.4.
In order to get the package into Debian I need to remove the whole non-free
directory and this causes compilation errors.
There are untested
Hi Maarten
Thanks for the work. I am building the Debian package, it compiles on amd64 at
least but I haven't tested to compile any code yet.
The list of files I need to clean manually in the debian/rules files just gets
bigger and bigger. Can you please add the list below to the clean target o
Hello Maarten,
On 03/27/2014 05:06 PM, Maarten Brock wrote:
>
> Hello SDCC friends,
>
> After again almost a full week delay due to problems in our distributed
> compile
> farm, I finally made the second Release Candidate (RC2) for
> SDCC 3.4.0. It has
> been put online in our SourceFor
Hello SDCC friends,
After again almost a full week delay due to problems in our
distributed compile farm, I finally made the second Release
Candidate (RC2) for SDCC 3.4.0. It has been put online in our
SourceForge File section.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/
If you have th
