no effence :)
Is the subject line should say stm8 ? not 32 ...
stm32 has already gcc ...
Regards
Le 2014-10-07 15:01, Ben Shi a écrit :
> Glad to hear that.
>
> In my opinion, an efficient way to optimize the code size is to substitute
> the standard libraries in c to in assembly, be
Glad to hear that.
In my opinion, an efficient way to optimize the code size is to substitute the
standard libraries in c to in assembly, besides more deep optimizations in the
code generator. So I hope more users can donate their code, just like Krzysztof
Nikiel's patch #246. ( http://sourcefo
Glad to hear that.
In my opinion, an efficient way to optimize the code size is to substitute the
standard libraries in c to in assembly, besides more deep optimizations in the
code generator. So I hope more users can donate their code, just like Krzysztof
Nikiel's patch #246. (http://sourcefor
if anyone is interested...
I did a fresh code size testbench for STM8 ( like
http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/index.php/Stm8_code_size )
1. command line: 'sdcc -mstm8 --opt-code-size -c'
release SDCC :
mcs51/z80/z180/r2k/r3ka/gbz80/tlcs90/ds390/pic16/pic14/TININative/ds400/hc08/s08/stm8
3.4.0
