On 17/09/2022 08:08, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Could you or Richard open a ticker in the bug tracker?
I think Richard should be the one to do that, as he was the one who
discovered the issue.
Unless he does not have (or does not wish to create) a SourceForge
account, in which case I am wi
Am 14.09.22 um 21:34 schrieb Basil Hussain:
I agree, parts of that assembly are weird. I don't think that code would
work properly.
Could you or Richard open a ticker in the bug tracker?
Philipp
___
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourcef
I agree, parts of that assembly are weird. I don't think that code would
work properly.
pusha
ld (0x01, sp), a
So, take the argument in A register, push it onto the stack ('cause we
want to later use A to pass a value of zero in call to _tm1638_curs)...
but then loa
I am updating my inline assembly code to work with the changes in 4.2
and have test code to verify the changes. This does not seem related to
inline assembly, but what looks like an incorrect optimization.
Here is the source:
void test_number(char tnum)
{
disp_clear();
disp_curs(0);
di
