Re: patch for SDL::Surface::blit

2004-08-13 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/08/13 | Friday | 08:19 AM [ author ] John Beppu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I was just saying that I, as a private individual who uses > SDL_Perl, found your patches useful. I don't have any > authority or maintainership over the SDL_Perl code. But damn... how ma

Re: patch for SDL::Surface::blit

2004-08-13 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/08/13 | Friday | 02:37 AM [ author ] Andy Bakun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I appreciate the patches you're putting up, and > > I am applying them. > > John, sorry to be obtuse, but where are you applying them? Do you have > access to some (relatively authoritative for SDL_Perl) sou

test

2004-08-13 Thread John Beppu
are these making it to the list??? reply if you see this.

Re: patch for SDL::Surface::blit

2004-08-12 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/07/30 | Friday | 09:16 PM [ author ] Andy Bakun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > SDL::Surface::blit always dies if you pass 0 (allowed according to the > docs) for drect. This is due to a typo when checking the parentage of > the passed arguments. Please see the attached patch, which chang

blessed scalars

2004-08-12 Thread John Beppu
While experimenting with SDL::App the other day, I noticed that the constructor returns a blessed scalar. Questions: - What does the dereferenced scalar contain? - Is that value likely to change during the life of the object? (I was going to explain why I wanted to know this,

Just out of curiosity...

2004-08-10 Thread John Beppu
Where's Dave Goehrig? Is he still alive somewhere?

Re: request for co maintainers

2004-03-16 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/03/14 | Sunday | 10:37 PM [ author ] David J. Goehrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Would those people interested in cpan > commit access for SDL_perl please send me > your cpan credentials. I'll add you to the > comaintainers. Dave, Just to be clear, are you talking about commit acce

Re: SDL_Perl v2.0.5 problems

2004-03-12 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/03/12 | Friday | 08:21 AM [ author ] chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 15:02, John Beppu wrote: > > > < [correction] http://svn.perl.org/modules/sdl/ > > > > Is it possible to do anonymous checkouts. > > Use gue

Re: SDL Perl 2.1.0 Released

2004-02-24 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/23 | Monday | 08:00 PM [ author ] David J. Goehrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > HOW TO USE SDL::Config IN YOUR PROGRAMS The has() method in this release has a bug. Here's how it looks right now: sub has { my ($class, $define) = @_; scalar grep { exis

Re: SDL Perl 2.1.0 Released

2004-02-24 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/24 | Tuesday | 09:02 AM [ author ] David J. Goehrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'd be more than happy to sync svn up, but > given those two above issues I can't at the > current time. Here's the quick and easy way to sync up svn with your releases. # set up your paths dave=~/src/S

Re: SDL Perl 2.1.0 Released

2004-02-24 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/24 | Tuesday | 09:02 AM [ author ] David J. Goehrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Anyways the point is moot unless I can get a copy > of the svn client ported to ARM platform and > running on the OpenZaurus 3.3.5 :) SDL Perl runs on that?! Sweet. I have a friend who will be overjoye

Re: sdl-checkout: BUGS file garbled?

2004-02-22 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/22 | Sunday | 06:28 PM [ author ] Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > :) I never used CVS so I cannot compare this. In any event, I will just use > commit and checkout and thats about it.. You should use update, too, to pull in changes that other people make. checkout is something tha

Re: sdl-checkout: BUGS file garbled?

2004-02-22 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/22 | Sunday | 09:17 PM [ author ] Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > One thing: How do we make sure that my changes don't clobber something > somebody else already worked on the time I work on it? Good communication is the key. If svn is anything like cvs on this matter, there's no

Re: sdl-checkout: BUGS file garbled?

2004-02-22 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/22 | Sunday | 11:15 AM [ author ] DH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PPS: > > A general Perl testing question -- Does anybody know how to run > > individual tests in the t/ directory? > perl -Mblib t/file.t > perl Build test verbose=1 --test_files=t/file.t > make test TEST_VER

Re: sdl-checkout: BUGS file garbled?

2004-02-22 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/22 | Sunday | 04:07 PM [ author ] Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Moin, > having a look at the newly checked out code from sdl-perl, I notice that the > BUGS file is about 700 K and contains a lot of garbage. Is this a problem > on my end, or a problem in the repository? I got a hu

Re: SDL_Perl v2.0.5 problems

2004-02-21 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/21 | Saturday | 07:53 PM [ author ] John Beppu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > You can get a perl.org account by going to > http://dev.perl.org/auth/account > > I just found out that a better URL would be http://auth.perl.org/

Re: SDL_Perl v2.0.5 problems

2004-02-21 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/21 | Saturday | 07:32 PM [ author ] chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If you already have a perl.org account (and you should sign up for one > if you don't), You can get a perl.org account by going to http://dev.perl.org/auth/account I had to ask google to find it

Re: SDL_Perl v2.0.5 problems

2004-02-21 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/21 | Saturday | 10:02 AM [ author ] chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The repository is http://sdl.perl.org/modules/perl/ http://svn.perl.org/modules/sdl/ (svn-n00b "Hey, is it possible to do anonymous checkouts.") If not, how do I get an account?

Re: SDL_Perl v2.0.5 problems

2004-02-20 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/18 | Wednesday | 07:00 PM [ author ] Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Moin, > > tried it for the first time (I admit :) and run into troubles. My first try as well. :) > Second: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/perl/game/sdl-perl/SDL_Perl-2.0.5> perl Build.PL > Base class package "Modu

Re: frozen bubble patches

2004-02-10 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/09 | Monday | 09:18 AM [ author ] david goehrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > attaced is a tarball containing most of the patches > needed to get fb fully working with 2.0.5 Did you forget to attach the patches?

Re: prerequisite insanity

2004-02-05 Thread John Beppu
[ date ] 2004/02/05 | Thursday | 09:17 AM [ author ] david goehrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Are you still in Europe or are you back in the States? (just curious)

ping

2004-02-03 Thread John Beppu
Anybody out there?