Although we should do Alien::SDL2 first.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Kartik Thakore wrote:
> pendant?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Tobias Leich wrote:
>
>> SDL2 is fine!
>>
>> I'll make the perl 6 pendant at some point...
>>
>> Kartik Thakore hat geschrieben:
>>
>> >SDL 2.0 AP
pendant?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Tobias Leich wrote:
> SDL2 is fine!
>
> I'll make the perl 6 pendant at some point...
>
> Kartik Thakore hat geschrieben:
>
> >SDL 2.0 API is STABLE! I will be working on getting libperl-sdl2 started.
> >Any thoughts on name space?
> >
> >SDL2 seems m
SDL2 is fine!
I'll make the perl 6 pendant at some point...
Kartik Thakore hat geschrieben:
>SDL 2.0 API is STABLE! I will be working on getting libperl-sdl2 started.
>Any thoughts on name space?
>
>SDL2 seems more logical. Would there be any issues with perl for having a
>number in the package
SDL 2.0 API is STABLE! I will be working on getting libperl-sdl2 started.
Any thoughts on name space?
SDL2 seems more logical. Would there be any issues with perl for having a
number in the package name?
-- Forwarded --
From: Sam Lantinga
Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:19 AM
Subjec