Re: Fwd: [SDL] SDL 2.0 API stabilization

2013-02-22 Thread Kartik Thakore
Although we should do Alien::SDL2 first. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Kartik Thakore wrote: > pendant? > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Tobias Leich wrote: > >> SDL2 is fine! >> >> I'll make the perl 6 pendant at some point... >> >> Kartik Thakore hat geschrieben: >> >> >SDL 2.0 AP

Re: Fwd: [SDL] SDL 2.0 API stabilization

2013-02-22 Thread Kartik Thakore
pendant? On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Tobias Leich wrote: > SDL2 is fine! > > I'll make the perl 6 pendant at some point... > > Kartik Thakore hat geschrieben: > > >SDL 2.0 API is STABLE! I will be working on getting libperl-sdl2 started. > >Any thoughts on name space? > > > >SDL2 seems m

AW: Fwd: [SDL] SDL 2.0 API stabilization

2013-02-22 Thread Tobias Leich
SDL2 is fine! I'll make the perl 6 pendant at some point... Kartik Thakore hat geschrieben: >SDL 2.0 API is STABLE! I will be working on getting libperl-sdl2 started. >Any thoughts on name space? > >SDL2 seems more logical. Would there be any issues with perl for having a >number in the package

Fwd: [SDL] SDL 2.0 API stabilization

2013-02-22 Thread Kartik Thakore
SDL 2.0 API is STABLE! I will be working on getting libperl-sdl2 started. Any thoughts on name space? SDL2 seems more logical. Would there be any issues with perl for having a number in the package name? -- Forwarded -- From: Sam Lantinga Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:19 AM Subjec