> Nate wants back into Sunny Day. Do they say: > > 1. Yes! We'd love to have you back. > 2. Yes, but only if he had quit the Foos before he > asked, showing he had > given everything up just to be back with SDRE. > 3. Well, we're sorry nate, but we enjoy being a > three piece now. > 4. No friggin' way, man. You had your chance. anyone even care what i think? didn't think so but here goes: sunny day real estate SHOULD say: 1. yes c'mon back. this would show that they are kind caring individuals. 2. this would make little sense as one can imagine that to screw oneself out of the means by which to support a family and pay a mortgage at the risk of being told to screw off would seem like just a plain ol' stinky idea. nate shouldn't have to ask anyway. 3. again, this would be a bad idea because the band has stunk (okay, been playing less enthusiastic music) since nate was no longer involved with the project. making it four again might bring back some of the spark that was lost. 4. one should skip #4 completely, unless it was said in a sarcastic manner and the real response after the joke was over was: "hey nate. come back and play amazing basslines. we have a whole bunch of fans that really dig us but we have lost a few in the fray because we just don't sound like we used to. uhhh, we just don't sound like sunny day real estate. we sound like a sdre cover band without you. so please come back." it will never happen. i rip on this band a lot but you must realize that they were practically the soundtrack of my life 1995 through 1998. maybe i am just like those dirty stinky hippies who live in the past, but i think for a band to have had that much of an impact and then to have lost it is kinda sad. oh well. i accept flames and spam. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/
