you have a good point that i agree with you on, but do you have to be so
mean about it?
zack
chapel hill, NC
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i personally don't want him back in the band. i like his work
that he contributed, but he bailed on the rest of the band.
oh, he bailed on SDRE? i guess he wasnt involved in the foos at all, eh?
sdre broke up. nate went on to make music in the foos. so sdre gets back
together and nate is suppose to say to grohl "hey, it was fun, but that EMO
band i was in is getting back together...you know the one where i had a huge
problem with the lead singer's christianity...well anyway Dave, im getting
back together with them."
is that how he was to avoid "bailing" on sdre?
and the reason you dont want nate back in the band is because he bailed on
them? so, if he were in the band you would be fine with it? like him if he
is in sdre, dont like him in he isnt in sdre. right?
damn, thats dumb. is it jeremy, dan, or will that is sucking your cock so
you say this dumb shit?
jeff.
