On 08/05/2013 09:19 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/05/2013 01:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Libvirt has no problem enabling -device pvpanic for all guests where
on_crash is set to a non-default value, since the use of on_crash is
a sufficient hint that the user expects the guest to be able to
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:32:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
As you see we do let people change many parameters
that do affect activation.
By editing XML user can shoot himself in the foot, we should not prevent
that.
So that's what I'm saying basically.
At the moment there's
- Original Message -
From: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
To: Vadim Rozenfeld vroze...@redhat.com
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com, Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com,
seabios@seabios.org, qemu-de...@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that there's
a single mouse there?
This is a PV technology which to me looks like it was
rushed through and not only set on by default, but
without a way to disable it -
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:03:17AM -0400, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
To: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Cc: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com, Marcel Apfelbaum
marce...@redhat.com, seabios@seabios.org,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that there's
a single mouse there?
This is a PV technology which to me looks like it was
rushed through
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:14:36AM -0400, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
To: Vadim Rozenfeld vroze...@redhat.com
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com, Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com,
Am 06.08.2013 10:36, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that there's
a single mouse there?
This is a PV technology which to me
- Original Message -
From: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
To: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Cc: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com, Marcel Apfelbaum
marce...@redhat.com, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-de...@nongnu.org, Gerd
Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:45:01AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 10:36, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:36:25AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that there's
a single mouse there?
This
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:45:01AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 10:36, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that there's
a single mouse there?
This is a PV technology which to me looks like it was
rushed through
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:26:46PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how likely is it that there's
a single mouse there?
This is a
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:21:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:36:25AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:20:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:45:01AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 10:36, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:56:11AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes:
Am 06.08.2013 10:36, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:26:46PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a mouse in a room, how
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:13:17PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:26:46PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:14:14PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:13:17PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:26:46PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:23:26PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:14:14PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:13:17PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at
Am 06.08.2013 11:32, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:21:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:36:25AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb
Am 06.08.2013 12:44, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:19:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It's a QEMU issue, devices that are added with -device are
documented in -device help and removed by dropping them from
command line. Devices added by default have no way to
be
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 12:44, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:19:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It's a QEMU issue, devices that are added with -device are
documented in -device help and removed by dropping them
Am 06.08.2013 13:00, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
I wonder if IPMI might be such an alternative in the future, in which
case we should come up with some way to fully disable pvpanic device
creation. CC'ing Corey.
IPMI was considered,
Hi,
And what are the rules that govern device exclusion from -nodefaults
list? Why -nodefaults does not create empty machine?
qemu -nodefaults should give you just cpu + northbridge + southbridge.
qemu should give you a usable virtual machine, so qemu adds some
optional devices which are
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 13:00, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
I wonder if IPMI might be such an alternative in the future, in which
case we should come up with some way to fully
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:00:06PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 13:00, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
I wonder if IPMI might be such an alternative in the
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:48:17PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 12:44, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:19:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It's a
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 12:44, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:19:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It's a QEMU issue, devices that are added with -device are
documented in -device help and removed by dropping them
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 02:00:35PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 11:32, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:21:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:36:25AM +0300, Gleb
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:54:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
And what are the rules that govern device exclusion from -nodefaults
list? Why -nodefaults does not create empty machine?
qemu -nodefaults should give you just cpu + northbridge + southbridge.
On modern machine this
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:05:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:00:06PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 13:00, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andreas
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:08:32PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 02:00:35PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 11:32, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:21:48PM +0300, Michael
Am 06.08.2013 14:09, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
FWIW -M q35 does not create all Q35 devices, there's -readconfig
docs/q35-chipset.cfg for the rest. The criteria certainly is not
migratability, since ICH9 AHCI (part of -M q35) is
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:11:41PM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From my quick research, it looks like Windows 2006 || Windows
2006.1 || Linux would work, but I have not tested it.
Paolo
This doesn't work in that it matches linux.
Note that the above was meant to be a
Am 06.08.2013 14:00, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 13:00, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
I wonder if IPMI might be such an alternative in the future, in which
case we
ATM it looks like we should test
Windows 2000 ||
Windows 2001 ||
Windows 2001 SP1 ||
Windows 2001.1 SP1
Including this may be too strict, what about 98/ME?
Isn't this past EOL?
So what? People try to use it with QEMU, and it's fair to assume
it's
Am 06.08.2013 11:20, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:45:01AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 10:36, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:33:10AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:21:52AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you see a
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:43:04PM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
ATM it looks like we should test
Windows 2000 ||
Windows 2001 ||
Windows 2001 SP1 ||
Windows 2001.1 SP1
Including this may be too strict, what about 98/ME?
Isn't this past
Hi,
I'm doing my own OS and i'm booting it from USB uhci. When it boots and it
arrives to the system code i want reading and writing from USB.
First of all i take the usb.c, util.c, usb.h, usb_uhci.c, usb_uhci.h,
pci.c, pci.h, pciinit.c,... and put it into my sources and i compile it but
i need
41 matches
Mail list logo
