On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 07:03:37AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Thanks. In general, looks fine to me.
> >
> > Some minor comments:
> >
> > If there's a read error or non-bootable device, shouldn't it just
> > revert to the original description?
>
> What about "empty" for drives not ready?
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:47:42AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 09/26/18 06:44, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Second, the v5 RFC doesn't actually address the alleged bus number
> >> shortage. IIUC, it supports a low number of ECAM ranges under 4GB, but
> >> those are (individually)
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 5:27 PM
> To: Liu, Changpeng ; seabios@seabios.org
> Cc: Harris, James R ; stefa...@redhat.com;
> Zedlewski, Piotr
> Subject: Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH] virtio-blk/scsi: enable
On 09/26/18 10:16, Liu, Changpeng wrote:
> I posted the patch again, because I didn't get any response since several
> months ago... :).
Indeed, you didn't receive any comments under that (July) posting,
regrettably:
On 09/26/18 06:44, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Second, the v5 RFC doesn't actually address the alleged bus number
>> shortage. IIUC, it supports a low number of ECAM ranges under 4GB, but
>> those are (individually) limited in the bus number ranges they can
>> accommodate (due to 32-bit
I posted the patch again, because I didn't get any response since several
months ago... :).
> -Original Message-
> From: Liu, Changpeng
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:24 PM
> To: seabios@seabios.org
> Cc: stefa...@redhat.com; Liu, Changpeng ; Harris,
> James R ; Zedlewski, Piotr
