On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:47:34AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 12/21/12 04:06, Amos Kong wrote:
In the v2-v3 change of what would become commit 37676f83
http://www.seabios.org/pipermail/seabios/2012-December/005166.html,
the
defense against an initial addr end condition (wraparound)
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 05:11:39AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
In the v2-v3 change of what would become commit 37676f83
http://www.seabios.org/pipermail/seabios/2012-December/005166.html, the
defense against an initial addr end condition (wraparound) was
erroneously loosened.
Thanks - I
Hi Laszlo,
In the v2-v3 change of what would become commit 37676f83
http://www.seabios.org/pipermail/seabios/2012-December/005166.html,
the
defense against an initial addr end condition (wraparound) was
erroneously loosened.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek lersek at redhat.com
---
In the v2-v3 change of what would become commit 37676f83
http://www.seabios.org/pipermail/seabios/2012-December/005166.html, the
defense against an initial addr end condition (wraparound) was
erroneously loosened.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com
---
src/smbios.c |4 ++--
1
