This is a gratuitous GCC-ism. For C code actually compiled with GCC we
should be using -m16 where it's available (GCC 4.9+).
And where the only thing marked with .code16gcc is explicit assembler
code, we should just use .code16 and avoid letting the compiler make any
of the assumptions that the
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 05:25:57PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
This is a gratuitous GCC-ism. For C code actually compiled with GCC we
should be using -m16 where it's available (GCC 4.9+).
And where the only thing marked with .code16gcc is explicit assembler
code, we should just use .code16
