Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-03-19 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:03:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-03-19 01:29, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>> EAX= EBX= ECX=c934 EDX=0068 > >>> ESI=6801 EDI= EBP=002b ESP=fff5 > > > > I tra

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-03-19 Thread Rudolf Marek
Hi, Maybe STACKS=9,512 would make it more. Rudolfa ___ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-03-19 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2012-03-19 01:29, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-02-27 10:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> I'm seeing current QEMU GIT fail to boot MS-Dos 6.22 with the following >>> crash: >>> >>> # qemu-system-x86_64 -fda ~/MS-DOS\ 6.22.img -m

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-03-18 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-02-27 10:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I'm seeing current QEMU GIT fail to boot MS-Dos 6.22 with the following > > crash: > > > > # qemu-system-x86_64 -fda ~/MS-DOS\ 6.22.img -m 1 -curses > > iPXE v1.0.0-591-g7aee315 > >

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-02-29 Thread Fred .
Modern operating systems does not use BIOS much. DOS use BIOS a lot. SeaBIOS is a BIOS, so should be able to run operating systems that use BIOS. So I think DOS is something that ought to run/work on SeaBIOS if SeaBIOS implements BIOS correctly. Shouldn't DOS be some milestone for SeaBIOS? Perhaps

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-02-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 03:45:13AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2012-02-27 10:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > I'm seeing current QEMU GIT fail to boot MS-Dos 6.22 with the following > > > crash: > > > > > > # qemu-system-x86_

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-02-29 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-02-27 10:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I'm seeing current QEMU GIT fail to boot MS-Dos 6.22 with the following > > crash: > > > > # qemu-system-x86_64 -fda ~/MS-DOS\ 6.22.img -m 1 -curses Does the error persist when run wi

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-02-27 Thread Peter Stuge
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Well, the Linux kernel can also be built with practically any distro > out there. Yeah. Maybe that gets tested more than building coreboot and SeaBIOS, and so problems are discovered by those who introduce them. > Having a need for a separate toolchain for building x86 on x86

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-02-27 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2012-02-27 17:00, Peter Stuge wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Then I noticed, that if I rebuild the BIOS, from the exact same revision >>> 1.6.3.1 revision that is committed in 'seabios' submodule in QEMU, then >>> it works fine. So AFAICT, it is not the Seabios source code at fault, >>> but rath

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-02-27 Thread Peter Stuge
Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Then I noticed, that if I rebuild the BIOS, from the exact same revision > > 1.6.3.1 revision that is committed in 'seabios' submodule in QEMU, then > > it works fine. So AFAICT, it is not the Seabios source code at fault, > > but rather the binary build we have commited to GI

Re: [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)

2012-02-27 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2012-02-27 10:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I'm seeing current QEMU GIT fail to boot MS-Dos 6.22 with the following > crash: > > # qemu-system-x86_64 -fda ~/MS-DOS\ 6.22.img -m 1 -curses > iPXE v1.0.0-591-g7aee315 > iPXE (http://ipxe.org) 00:03.0 C900 PCI2.10