On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 12:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > For CSM, the highest priority is zero. In SeaBIOS that means "don't", and > the highest priority is 1. > > So we end up with the fun outcome that booting from NVMe worked only > when it *wasn't* selected as the primary boot target, because we don't > actually run the nvme_controller_setup() thread for an NVMe controller > if its boot prio is zero. > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org>
Hm, turns out the NVMe hack is something that's only in our tree so for upstream that second paragraph is a lie and can be dropped. It's still a correct change to reflect the fact that SeaBIOS doesn't use zero for the highest priority, and correctly handle BBS_DO_NOT_BOOT_FROM and BBS_IGNORE_ENTRY values.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-le...@seabios.org
