Fred . wrote:
Fred . wrote:
Anyone wishing to test this, can get a bootdisk from bootdisk.com.
http://bootdisk.com/bootdisk.htm
Did you verify that those bootdisks do in fact reproduce the problem?
Doing that would be a good way to help the project.
No, I did not.
It would
Hello,
I bisected down 2 DOS 6.22 compatibility issues:
1.) COMMAND.COM can not be loaded high,
9c98517c938d20c38f537d516c71b30bb60c3ea0 is the first bad commit
Looks like and UMB generated which is not recognizeable ...
Before: 9E80-9F7F: 4k EBDA, 9F80-9FFF: 2k UNUSED, really unused or used
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 06:44:53PM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
I bisected down 2 DOS 6.22 compatibility issues:
1.) COMMAND.COM can not be loaded high,
9c98517c938d20c38f537d516c71b30bb60c3ea0 is the first bad commit
Looks like and UMB generated which is not recognizeable ...