在 2012-12-18二的 13:41 +0100，Vasilis Liaskovitis写道：
This patch adds a 'SIZE' type property to qdev.
It will make dimm description more convenient by allowing sizes to be
specified
with K,M,G,T prefixes instead of number of bytes e.g.:
-device dimm,id=mem0,size=2G,bus=membus.0
Credits go
在 2013-01-09三的 01:08 +0100，Andreas Färber写道：
Am 18.12.2012 13:41, schrieb Vasilis Liaskovitis:
Because dimm layout needs to be configured on machine-boot, all dimm devices
need to be specified on startup command line (either with populated=on or
with
populated=off). The dimm information
Hi,
Turns out it's this:
commit 76e58028d28e78431f9de3cee0b3c88d807fa39d
Author: Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net
Date: Wed Mar 6 21:50:09 2013 -0500
acpi: Eliminate BDAT parameter passing to DSDT code.
The BDAT construct is the only ACPI mechanism that relies on
Am Dienstag, den 19.03.2013, 22:18 -0400 schrieb Kevin O'Connor:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:59:53AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 19.03.2013, 19:05 -0400 schrieb Kevin O'Connor:
Basically everything under the BIOS interfaces menu is low-level and
should not be changed without
Paul Menzel wrote:
it would be nice if it is clear for noobs like me, what certain
option do and what effects they have.
The good way to fix that is for you to send patches for the Kconfig
help messages. *After* you have researched what the options do.
//Peter
pgptDFHdnLwQL.pgp
Description:
On 03/20/2013 12:06 AM, li guang wrote:
+return snprintf(dest, len, %0.03f%c, (double)*ptr/div, suffixes[i]);
^^ ^^^
+}
+
IMHO, you may need (double)(*ptr/div), for type cast is right
associated.
No, the code as written is
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
tables to qemu, we need to make sure the code we'll be
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 08:17 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Turns out it's this:
commit 76e58028d28e78431f9de3cee0b3c88d807fa39d
Author: Kevin O'Connor ke...@koconnor.net
Date: Wed Mar 6 21:50:09 2013 -0500
acpi: Eliminate BDAT parameter passing to DSDT code.
On 2013-03-20 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the
Hi,
With qemu/master you can just use 'qemu -L /path/to/seabios/out' instead
and qemu will pick up both bios.bin and dsdt from the fresh seabios
build directory then (and anything else it doesn't find there from the
default locations).
Thanks, yes that's it. QEMU only seems to look in
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:46 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
With qemu/master you can just use 'qemu -L /path/to/seabios/out' instead
and qemu will pick up both bios.bin and dsdt from the fresh seabios
build directory then (and anything else it doesn't find there from the
default
As QEMU gains PCI bridge and PCIe root port support, we won't always
find the VGA device on the root bus. We therefore need to add support
to find and enable a VGA device and the path to it through the VGA
Enable support in the PCI bridge control register.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson
Dear Alex,
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 10:58 -0600 schrieb Alex Williamson:
As QEMU gains PCI bridge and PCIe root port support,
could you give a commit or version for QEMU please.
we won't always find the VGA device on the root bus. We therefore
need to add support to find and enable a
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 19:05 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Alex,
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 10:58 -0600 schrieb Alex Williamson:
As QEMU gains PCI bridge and PCIe root port support,
could you give a commit or version for QEMU please.
This would be targeted towards QEMU 1.5. Michael
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com
---
src/acpi.c | 19 ---
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/acpi.c b/src/acpi.c
index 8bbc92b..611553e 100644
--- a/src/acpi.c
+++ b/src/acpi.c
@@ -797,13 +797,13 @@ acpi_setup(void)
struct
These fields are wider than a single byte; stick to cpu_to_leXX() for
consistency with other field settings in this function.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com
---
src/acpi.c | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/acpi.c b/src/acpi.c
The first patch cleans up some field assignments in build_madt(). The
second one handles the case when MADT is provided by qemu over fw_cfg.
I'll soon post the qemu-side series as well.
I cross-tested {patched, unpatched} qemu with {patched, unpatched}
seabios. Inside a RHEL-6 guest I dumped the
Il 20/03/2013 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving
On 03/20/2013 11:57 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:53:04PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
These fields are wider than a single byte; stick to cpu_to_leXX() for
consistency with other field settings in this function.
Thanks. We can do this to improve documentation. Please ack that you
are okay with licensing under
On 03/20/13 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
On 03/21/13 00:52, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:53:04PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
These fields are wider than a single byte; stick to cpu_to_leXX() for
consistency with other field settings in this function.
Thanks. We can do this to improve documentation. Please ack
On 03/20/13 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
QEMU is GPLv2 at the moment, so as a step in the process of moving acpi
Acked-by: Kenji Kaneshige kaneshige.ke...@jp.fujitsu.com
Regards,
Kenji Kaneshige
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 12:58 AM
To: seabios@seabios.org
Cc: David Woodhouse; Eduardo Habkost; Gerd Hoffmann; Gleb Natapov;
Acked-by: Isaku Yamahata yamah...@valinux.co.jp
thanks,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
You are getting this mail because you might have contributed code to one
of the files in seabios that we want to reuse in QEMU,
when this file was under GPLv3 or LGPLv3.
28 matches
Mail list logo
