Hello,
I'm looking for a fix in
http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios/source/tree/master/scripts/layoutrom.py
file. Apparently the fix is already in the master, but it's hard for me to use
directly from master. Currently all existing tags are old and doesn't reflect
latest layoutrom.py changes.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:20:22PM +, Pandey, Sunil K wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a fix in
http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios/source/tree/master/scripts/layoutrom.py
file. Apparently the fix is already in the master, but it's hard for
me to use directly from master. Currently all
Pandey, Sunil K wrote:
the fix is already in the master, but it's hard for me to use
directly from master. Currently all existing tags are old and
doesn't reflect latest layoutrom.py changes.
Wherever you use a tag with git you can also provide a commit hash.
It should work well to simply
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for response. Following are specific change I'm talking about. Compilers
are not expected to create .rodata.str1.1, .rodata.__func__ and
.rodata.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__. If compiler decide to use some other .rodata__
suffix name in place of __func__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ or
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:04:47PM +, Pandey, Sunil K wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for response. Following are specific change I'm talking
about. Compilers are not expected to create .rodata.str1.1,
.rodata.__func__ and .rodata.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__. If compiler
decide to use some other
Is this the only thing preventing compilation on the Intel compiler?
Yes, this is the only problem for Intel compiler.
I can directly use from git checkout but issue is, SeaBios is indirectly
included in many other open source applications which is based on SeaBios
release tag. Anytime, when I
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:03:29PM +, Pandey, Sunil K wrote:
Is this the only thing preventing compilation on the Intel compiler?
Yes, this is the only problem for Intel compiler.
I can directly use from git checkout but issue is, SeaBios is
indirectly included in many other open source