On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 05:40:16PM -0500, Matt DeVillier wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:49 PM Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:43:08PM -0500, Matt DeVillier wrote:
> > > v2 of the patch works as intended, once 'current.offset !=
> > current.offset'
> > > is corrected to
Check whenever pnp roms attempt to redirect int19, and in case it does
log a message and undo the redirect.
A pnp rom should not need this, we have BEVs and BCVs for that.
Nevertheless there are roms in the wild which are redirecting int19.
At least some BIOS implementations for physical hardware
v2 of the patch works as intended, once 'current.offset != current.offset'
is corrected to 'current.offset != seabios.offset'
cheers,
Matt
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:03 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:53:01PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:43:08PM -0500, Matt DeVillier wrote:
> v2 of the patch works as intended, once 'current.offset != current.offset'
> is corrected to 'current.offset != seabios.offset'
FWIW, that code could simply be:
static int boot_irq_captured(void)
{
return GET_IVT(0x19).segoff
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:49 PM Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:43:08PM -0500, Matt DeVillier wrote:
> > v2 of the patch works as intended, once 'current.offset !=
> current.offset'
> > is corrected to 'current.offset != seabios.offset'
>
> FWIW, that code could simply be:
>
>
