Re: [SeaBIOS] [BROKEN RFC 0/5] can we enable the qemu debug port for real-mode code?

2013-02-13 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 02/13/13 06:19, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > I think it's possible to get it working > > with CONFIG_QEMU_HARDWARE with something like the patch below. > > Are two builds necessary with this change? One with CSM && QEMU_HARDWARE > (wh

Re: [SeaBIOS] [BROKEN RFC 0/5] can we enable the qemu debug port for real-mode code?

2013-02-13 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 02/13/13 06:19, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:52:09AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> This series bears witness to my extreme cluelessness. With it I'm only >> asking if we can move the hypervisor/platform detection logic to SRCBOTH >> code, so that it sets up "PlatformRunning

Re: [SeaBIOS] [BROKEN RFC 0/5] can we enable the qemu debug port for real-mode code?

2013-02-12 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:52:09AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > This series bears witness to my extreme cluelessness. With it I'm only > asking if we can move the hypervisor/platform detection logic to SRCBOTH > code, so that it sets up "PlatformRunningOn" for all of CSM, vgabios, > and "normal" Se

[SeaBIOS] [BROKEN RFC 0/5] can we enable the qemu debug port for real-mode code?

2013-02-12 Thread Laszlo Ersek
This series bears witness to my extreme cluelessness. With it I'm only asking if we can move the hypervisor/platform detection logic to SRCBOTH code, so that it sets up "PlatformRunningOn" for all of CSM, vgabios, and "normal" SeaBIOS. The motivation is that running on qemu is now a requirement for