On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:07:06PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 08/13/2012 05:49 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
How different are they. Can you give human readable example?
Here are the examples from the IPMI spec. I lied a little bit,
there are actually four standard interfaces (one can be on
On 08/13/2012 07:25 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:07:06PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 08/13/2012 05:49 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
How different are they. Can you give human readable example?
Here are the examples from the IPMI spec. I lied a little bit,
there are
On 08/13/2012 05:49 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On
How different are they. Can you give human readable example?
Here are the examples from the IPMI spec. I lied a little bit,
there are actually four standard interfaces (one can be on an
SMBus), but it's a different thing to manage, I think.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:22:12PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
Patch 2 is complex and I don't fully understand what it is doing. A
quick scan leads me to believe it is constructing a dynamic SSDT -
though it's not clear why a dynamic SSDT is needed and why the
existing mechanism (see
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:47:50AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:22:12PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
Patch 2 is complex and I don't fully understand what it is doing. A
quick scan leads me to believe it is constructing a
On 08/13/2012 01:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:22:12PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
Patch 2 is complex and I don't fully understand what it is doing. A
quick scan leads me to believe it is constructing a dynamic SSDT -
though it's not clear why a dynamic SSDT is needed
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:48:58AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 08/08/2012 11:11 AM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
I went ahead and kept the structure passing because I've added ACPI
support. After thinking about it a while, I think if you have to
pass anything to SMBIOS (like IPMI is present) you
On 08/12/2012 07:49 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:48:58AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 08/08/2012 11:11 AM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
I went ahead and kept the structure passing because I've added ACPI
support. After thinking about it a while, I think if you have to
pass
On 08/08/2012 11:11 AM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
I went ahead and kept the structure passing because I've added ACPI
support. After thinking about it a while, I think if you have to
pass anything to SMBIOS (like IPMI is present) you might as well
pass the whole structure, and making things fixed
I went ahead and kept the structure passing because I've added ACPI
support. After thinking about it a while, I think if you have to
pass anything to SMBIOS (like IPMI is present) you might as well
pass the whole structure, and making things fixed in the BIOS that
can change in the hardware
10 matches
Mail list logo
