[security-dev 00976]: Re: code review request 6852744: PIT b61: PKI test suite fails because self signed certificates are being rejected

Sean Mullan wrote: Xuelei Fan wrote: webrev updated, adding comments to tests: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/6852744/webrev.02/ In DisableRevocation.java, why do you add CRLs to the CertStore if revocation is disabled? The CRLs are useless, I will remove those lines. Thanks, Xuelei

[security-dev 00975]: Re: code review request 6852744: PIT b61: PKI test suite fails because self signed certificates are being rejected

Xuelei Fan wrote: webrev updated, adding comments to tests: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/6852744/webrev.02/ In DisableRevocation.java, why do you add CRLs to the CertStore if revocation is disabled? I think I understand what are your concerns now. If I'm right, you think that the ta

[security-dev 00974]: hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6628737: Specification of wrapper class valueOf static factories should require caching

Changeset: ae60bb671e54 Author:darcy Date: 2009-07-09 12:31 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/ae60bb671e54 6628737: Specification of wrapper class valueOf static factories should require caching Reviewed-by: mr ! src/share/classes/java/lang/Byte.java ! src/shar