code review request: 7032354: no-addresses should not be used on acceptor side

2011-03-29 Thread Weijun Wang
Hi Valerie http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/7032354/webrev.00/ I've removed the use of this setting on the acceptor side, now host address check is only performed if caddr is inside service ticket and the acceptor has a way to get the initiator's address (currently, thru channel binding onl

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2011-03-29 Thread alan . bateman
Changeset: 646047d77db9 Author:alanb Date: 2011-03-30 00:59 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/646047d77db9 7026507: Bidi initialization fails if AWT not present Reviewed-by: okutsu ! src/share/classes/sun/text/bidi/BidiBase.java Changeset: a40982a82291 Author:

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6381464: SimpleFormatter should use one single line format

2011-03-29 Thread mandy . chung
Changeset: d2bbdd709307 Author:mchung Date: 2011-03-29 15:58 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/d2bbdd709307 6381464: SimpleFormatter should use one single line format Summary: Define a new logging properties to support custom output format Reviewed-by: alanb ! s

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 7024172: Move BufferPoolMXBean and PlatformLoggingMXBean java.lang.management

2011-03-29 Thread mandy . chung
Changeset: 3e001dd50408 Author:mchung Date: 2011-03-29 15:50 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/3e001dd50408 7024172: Move BufferPoolMXBean and PlatformLoggingMXBean java.lang.management Reviewed-by: alanb + src/share/classes/java/lang/management/BufferPoolMXBean

Re: Exception while processing 'no-addresses' flag in KrbApReq.java

2011-03-29 Thread Szabolcs Pota
Hi Max, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: > Update: > > I think I was wrong about caddr in a service ticket. JRE does not provide > the address field in its TGS-REQ packet, but the KDC can still set the caddr > in a ticket. > Yes. I've tested and the client addresses are indee

hg: jdk7/tl/langtools: 4 new changesets

2011-03-29 Thread maurizio . cimadamore
Changeset: 2007998f89f2 Author:mcimadamore Date: 2011-03-29 16:40 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/2007998f89f2 7030687: Diamond: compiler accepts erroneous code where diamond is used with non-generic inner class Summary: Diamond accepts non-parameterized

Re: Exception while processing 'no-addresses' flag in KrbApReq.java

2011-03-29 Thread Weijun Wang
Update: I think I was wrong about caddr in a service ticket. JRE does not provide the address field in its TGS-REQ packet, but the KDC can still set the caddr in a ticket. So forget about that patch. Anyway, my previous mail on address from channel binding is still valid. You can try callin

Re: Exception while processing 'no-addresses' flag in KrbApReq.java

2011-03-29 Thread Weijun Wang
Hi Szabolcs On 03/29/2011 09:18 PM, Szabolcs Pota wrote: Hi Max, The client was Java in all cases. I've tried with the following combinations: * Open JDK b133 with JGSS * Open JDK b133 with MIT native Kerberos I guess this means using the native GSS provider with -Dsun.security.jgss

Re: Exception while processing 'no-addresses' flag in KrbApReq.java

2011-03-29 Thread Szabolcs Pota
Hi Max, The client was Java in all cases. I've tried with the following combinations: - Open JDK b133 with JGSS - Open JDK b133 with MIT native Kerberos - JDK 6u23 with JGSS - JDK 6u23with MIT native Kerberos The result is always the same: Caused by: sun.security.krb5.internal.KrbAp

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 7031929: Variable names typos in Release-embedded.gmk

2011-03-29 Thread david . holmes
Changeset: 19567f9d6962 Author:dholmes Date: 2011-03-29 08:15 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/19567f9d6962 7031929: Variable names typos in Release-embedded.gmk Reviewed-by: alanb ! make/common/Release-embedded.gmk