Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
OK. Webrev is there:
http://oss-patches.24.eu/openjdk8/NoSuchMechanismException/REBASED_ON_8018d541a7b2_2/
Can someone review this?
I think this one will require careful review and I'm not even sure that
it's worth it. Using serialPersistentFields and
Looks fine though you missed updating the copyright date on the test.
--Sean
On 8/25/11 9:44 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
[ Add security-dev@openjdk.java.net to CC]
I think so. javax/xml/crypto is public API and it should go to
jdk_security2 (along with javax/crypto). Of course, that is still
On 08/26/2011 09:15 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Looks fine though you missed updating the copyright date on the test.
Recently I form a new habit of not touching copyright years at all, so
that a changeset can be ported to another version with no change at all.
-Max
--Sean
On 8/25/11 9:44
On 8/26/11 9:42 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 08/26/2011 09:15 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Looks fine though you missed updating the copyright date on the test.
Recently I form a new habit of not touching copyright years at all, so
that a changeset can be ported to another version with no change
Changeset: 6d2f09eed4e3
Author:alanb
Date: 2011-08-26 22:24 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/6d2f09eed4e3
7060243: (dc) Multicasting tests fail on Windows XP if IPv6 is enabled
Reviewed-by: alanb
Contributed-by: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com
!
Am 22.08.2011 17:28, schrieb Sean Mullan:
(dropping core-libs-dev)
On 8/22/11 9:03 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
while making some change for using exception-chaining on RuntimeException in
more cases, i found that javax.xml.crypto.NoSuchMechnismException had a private
cause field that
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you for your contribution on OpenJDK.
The update looks fine to me. Do you have a CR (Change Request) for this
update?
BTW, have you signed the Oracle Contribution Agreement [1]? I did not
find you name in the OpenJDK people list.
Thanks,
Xuelei
[1]