912 return modClass.getMethod(methodName, parameters);
It would be better to call LoginModule.class.getMethod().
Also, do you want to add a test case that includes a good login() method but
the class not extending LoginModule? This would show our fallback still works.
Thanks
Max
O
Ping! Any takers out there?
Many thanks,
--Jamil
On 08/11/2014 02:56 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Hello all,
This webrev covers a fix to LoginContext so it no longer selects the
wrong method when a LoginModule method (login, logout, commit, etc.)
has been overloaded.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.j
On 08/18/2014 05:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
This change addresses a severe performance regression, first introduced
in JDK 8, triggered by the negotiation of a GCM cipher suite in the TLS
implementation. This regression is a result of the poor performance of
the implementation of the GHASH fun
Hi,
I was suggested to restart the discussion about the topic on this list.
I would like to reboot a discussion around an improved TLS extensions
API in order to support ALPN (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7301), which is
the mechanism required by HTTP 2.0 to negotiate the new version of the
Looks fine to me. Do you still need to import java.lang.reflect.* though?
--Sean
On 08/11/2014 10:14 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Please review the fix at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8054817/webrev.00
since we have a new getuid() now for all Unix systems.
It does return -1 on Windows, b
On 01/27/2014 05:46 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
GCM uses a GF2 multiply as part of the integrity calculation. That
operation is pretty expensive. My guess is that if the code was
profiled, you'd find a lot of time being spent in
com.sun.crypto.provider.GHASH.
I ran into this and posted a fix:
We don't write "@bug JDK-8048052". Should be "@bug 8048052".
--Max
On Jul 28, 2014, at 17:04, FELIX YANG wrote:
> Please review a new test to "setFactory" permission. It is to address that
> "setFactory" permission is required or not as expected in a series of
> classes/methods under java.net
On 07/28/2014 05:04 AM, FELIX YANG wrote:
Please review a new test to "setFactory" permission. It is to address
that "setFactory" permission is required or not as expected in a series
of classes/methods under java.net.
JDK Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048052
Webrev: http://cr
This change addresses a severe performance regression, first introduced
in JDK 8, triggered by the negotiation of a GCM cipher suite in the TLS
implementation. This regression is a result of the poor performance of
the implementation of the GHASH function.
I first tried to eliminate just the
Hi Kevin
I tried to read the new test. TestMDChange and TestMDShare are OK, but I am
confused on what testDigestOnOff is doing. Can you add some comments there?
Thanks
Max
On Aug 18, 2014, at 14:35, zaiyao liu wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> Can you help to review this new test for DigestIOStream?
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
